A Thing of Beauty, And Divinity…

Trending towards beauty is considered to be a common human trait. It has been more so with me from a very young age, with all things beautiful claiming undivided attention, ranging from people, literature, forms of art and performances thereof, sculptures, paintings, designer constructions and landscapes, to being outdoors at golden dawn hours and silvery moon-lit nights. Who would not like to recall, in the context of beauty, the opening lines of Keats’ Endymion, celebrating the eternal love between Selene, the mythological moon goddess, and Endymion, the shepherd, “A thing of beauty is a joy forever: / Its loveliness increases; it will never / Pass into nothingness; but still will keep / A bower quiet for us, and a sleep / Full of sweet dreams, and health, and quiet breathing”? As a distinctive characteristic of a person, animal, place, object or idea that provides a perceptual experience of pleasure or satisfaction, beauty often involves an interpretation of some entity as being in balance and harmony with nature, which may lead to feelings of attraction and emotional well-being. Since the experience is mostly subjective, it is often said that beauty dwells in the eyes of the beholder. Integral to aesthetics, sociology, social psychology and culture, an ideal beauty is an entity admired for perfection or possessing features widely attributed to be in sync with symmetry and harmony of proportions.

The classical Greek noun for beauty is kallos and the adjective beautiful, kalos. Beautiful in Koine Greek is horaios, derived from the word hora, meaning ’hour’. In Koine Greek beauty was thus associated with ‘being of one’s hour’. A ripe fruit is, thus, deemed to be beautiful, whereas a woman trying to appear either younger or older than her age would not be considered beautiful, even though the view can be shouted down in this day and age by the fair gender, and the humongous cosmetic industry. The criteria for attractiveness are similar across different genders and cultures, showing a preference for beauty as emerging from one’s early age. Style and fashion may vary widely, but the perception of beauty is seen to be mostly based on common grounds across cultures and nationalities. The earliest western theory of beauty can be traced to Greek philosophers from pre-Socratic period, such as Pythagoras, who saw a pronounced connection between mathematics and beauty. It was noticed that objects proportioned in accordance with golden ratio (in math, two quantities are in golden ratio if their ratio is the same as the ratio of their sum to the larger of the two quantities, a factor applied, not just in math, but across all disciplines) seemed more attractive. Ancient Greek architecture is based on the above view of symmetry and proportion. According to Plato, beauty is the form or idea above all other ideas; Aristotle perceives a relationship between what is beautiful and virtuous, arguing that “virtue aims at the beautiful”. Sculptures of human forms created according to tenets of Greek philosophers relating to ideal human beauty were rediscovered in Renaissance Europe, leading to a re-adoption of what came to be known as ‘classical ideal’, whereby a woman whose appearance conforms to these tenets is described as a classical beauty.

The foundations laid down by Greek and Roman artists also constitute the standard for male beauty in western civilization. Paine’s ‘The Age of Reason’ saw increased interest in beauty as a philosophical subject. Scottish philosopher Francis Hutcheson argued that beauty is ‘unity in variety and variety in unity’. The Romantic poets, notably Keats, contemplated on the nature of beauty, as in ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’, “Beauty is truth, truth beauty, – that is all, / Ye know on earth, and all ye need to know”, a postulate that finds expatiation in the Upanishads, as satyam, shivam, sundaram, meaning ‘truth, godliness, beauty’. The truth of existence is experienced as godliness manifesting as beauty. Satyam means the truth as it really is outside the perceptions of the conditioned and prejudiced mind. The human mind is largely conditioned by society, religions and ego-driven notions and prejudices. It has to be totally emptied of all these falsities and distortions to arrive at its purest presence for truth to emerge, in a thoughtless state where one simply sees the truth as it verily is, not any conception of it. Shivam means virtue, the ultimate good, godliness; the person experiencing truth goes logically on to live the truth, and doing so is shivam, or truth in action.

The proof of world’s divinity is a person of truth; when queried as to what is truth, Ramakrishna Paramahamsa famously responded, ‘I am the argument, and if you cannot see in my eyes the proof and the evidence, you will not find it anywhere else. I am the only proof that existence is not dead, that existence is not only matter, that existence is not only available to science, that existence is much more than matter, that you are much more than the body, that you are much more than the mind..’ Ramakrishna’s ‘much more’ defied definition in logic or science, compelling the need to consider shivam, the mystic in action, his way of life as proof and the only possibility of attaining realization of the divine surrounding the universe, the window through which one can see beyond, leading to the spiritual. The action of the mystic contrasts with those in the mundane world, informed as it is with a totality fully dedicated to task on hand, and the fullness and intensity of such dedication equate to sundaram or beauty, collectively constituting the mystic trinity of satyam, the truth, shivam, the good and divine, and sundaram, the beauty. Beauty in its familiar forms exist in glorious sunrises and colourful sunsets, star-lit skies and surging ocean waves, majestic mountains, flowery country sides and horizons of shifting clouds dotted with winged birds in flight. Beauty in its most sublime form resides beyond all of these; it exists in the totality and intensity of the mystic, as the greatest flowering of consciousness itself; it can be realized by people possessing a humility and receptivity that leaves all windows of being open, living a life of love and kindness, like the Shivas, Krishnas, Zarathushtras, Buddhas, Christs, Muhammeds and other sages and prophets who walked the earth. It has no existence in closed lives of fear, hatred, selfishness and paranoia. Truth is the experience, shivam is the action arising out of the experience, and beauty, as the beautiful rose blooming in the heart of the mystic, is the flowering of consciousness of the person who has experienced truth. In such a state, the experiencer transforms worship as the enjoyment of beauty, as the perception of unity in diversity and divinity in all forms of life. It is safe to deduce that Saundariya Lahiri was composed in such a state by Adi Shankara, after his vision of the divine mother. It is by virtue of the beautiful that we are able to acquire a lasting remembrance of the true world. Plato describes the beautiful as that which shines forth the most clearly and draws us to itself, as the very visibility of the ideal.

Aside from external and metaphysical aspects of beauty, at the other end of the scale is the opposite, described as ugliness, defined as the characteristic of a person or an object that is unpleasant to look at, aesthetically unattractive, repulsive or offensive. Such features of external form can often be misleading if one takes a look at history, as ugliness is a central aspect of the persona of many a distinguished personage. Jean Paul Satre had a lazy eye and a bloated, asymmetrical face, and he attributed many of his philosophical ideas to a life-long struggle to reconcile with his self-described ugliness. Socrates used his ugliness as a philosophical landing point, concluding that philosophy could redeem people from outward ugliness. Widely known around the world during his time for his perceived ugliness, Abraham Lincoln was described, rather uncharitably, by Edward Dicey, a contemporary British journalist, “To say he is ugly is nothing, to add that his figure is grotesque, is to convey no adequate impression”. His looks, however, proved to be an asset in his personal and political relationships, as William Herndon, his biographer and partner in law firm, wrote, “He was not a pretty man by any means, nor was he an ugly one; he was a homely man, careless of his looks, plain-looking and plain-acting. He had no pomp, display, or dignity, so-called. He appeared simple in his carriage and bearing. He was a sad-looking man, his melancholy dripped from him as he walked. His apparent gloom impressed his friends, and created sympathy for him – one means of his great success”. And so it is, with a large number of people in many strata and walks of life, distinguishing themselves with great distinction, grotesqueness of external appearance notwithstanding.

The twentieth century saw an increasing rejection of beauty by artists and philosophers alike, culminating in post-modernism’s anti-aesthetics, in spite of beauty being a dominant concern of one of post-modernism’s main influences, Friedrich Nietzsche, who argued that the Will to Power was the Will to Beauty, “Beauty is for the artist something outside all orders of rank, because in beauty opposites are tamed; the highest sign of power, namely power over opposites; moreover, without tension: — that violence is no longer needed: that everything follows, obeys, so easily and so pleasantly – that is what delights the artist’s Will to Power”. Aesthetic experience, as executed through art, is a manifestation of the ‘will to power’. The artist, the viewer, and the art itself propagate and amalgamate in power relationships with one and other, all executing power in their own right.

In the aftermath of post-modernism’s rejection of beauty, thinkers have returned to beauty as an important value. Guy Sircello, American analytic philosopher, proposed his new theory of beauty in a bid to reaffirm its status as an important philosophical concept, maintaining that beauty is mostly objective in that, when a judgment of beauty is made, it relates to qualities possessed by the object; an alpine sunset is seen as beautiful due to the quality of light expressed in the sunset, or perhaps because of the intense depth of the vista, or because some other attribute of the scene that stands out as exceptional in some way. For Sircello, beauty resides in the possession by objects, scenes, and actions of qualities to a very high degree. For Elaine Scarry, beauty is related to truth and justice. A thing of beauty ignites the desire for truth and justice by giving us, with an electric brightness the experience of conviction and error. The liability to error, contestation, and plurality, for which beauty has often been belittled, has sometimes been cited as evidence of its falsehood and distance from truth, when the actual case is that our very aspiration for truth and fairness is its legacy. It creates, without itself fulfilling, the aspiration for enduring certitude. It comes to us, almost greeting us in welcome, with no work of our own; then leaves us duly prepared to undertake laborious effort aimed at advancing towards fairness and truth. The word ‘fair’ is used to denote loveliness of countenance, and ethicality in dealings as in being fair, playing fair and fair distribution. It may be debated that fairness as an ethical principle originated, not from its adjectival usage to mean comely beauty but from the wholly distinct noun, as in ‘annual fair’, to mean an exhibition to promote sale of merchandise or items of art. An etymological analysis can nail the debate in favour of the adjective, ‘fairness’, tracing from a cluster of roots in European languages and cognates in both East European and Sanskrit, all pointing to the aesthetic use of ‘fair’ to mean beautiful, pleasing to the eye, similarly placed, as when something matches or exists in accord with another object’s shape or size; ‘fair’ is connected to the verbs vegen (Dutch) and fegen (German) meaning ‘to adorn’, ‘to decorate’, and ‘to sweep’; fegen is in turn connected to the verb fay, the transitive and intransitive verb meaning ‘to join’, ‘to unite’, ‘to pact’; in turn, the making of a covenant or treaty or agreement, is from the same root as pax, pacis, the word for peace. The connect between fairness in beauty and fairness in justice clarifies itself in John Rawls’ definition of fairness as a ‘symmetry of everyone’s relations to each other’. It links in proximity to Aristotle’s statement that justice is a perfect cube, equal and proportionate in all directions. Beauty and justice share balance and the weighing of sides, according to Stuart Hampshire. We are drawn to symmetry intuitively, and injustices are perceived as imbalance, when something is amiss, not only through reason but also through sensory faculty.

The characterization of a person as beautiful, either individually or by consensus, is often based on some combination of inner beauty, which includes psychological factors such as personality, intelligence, grace, politeness, charisma, integrity, congruence and elegance, in addition to external aesthetic attributes that make for physical attractiveness. The outer cannot be a substitute for the inner, whereas it, vice versa, can be. And that explains the abiding success and renown of Socrates, Satre, Lincoln and legions of others who dazzled brilliantly on the world’s stage purely on strength of their inner radiance. The perspective is very much the same if one scans some of the major religions; Shiva, Rama and Krishna were all dark complexioned, contrary to their fairly glowing depictions in art and paintings; Krishna is described in scriptures as kaarmukil varna, Sanskrit for the ‘colour of rain-clouds’. The name krishna means ‘dark and all-attractive’, the darkness that attracts everything to itself and illumines the world, in contrast with white colour that only reflects light. Similarly, the depiction of Christ in fair and compassionate features is born out of creative genius of Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Hans Holbein, Raphael, Titian, Ghiberti, Vasari and other European artists; according to researched findings, Christ was short, with a patchy beard, and swarthy, in sharp contrast to the fair and well featured portraits by artists.

In light of larger and many dimensions of beauty, it would appear regrettable that popular culture is pathetically skewed in the perception of human beauty, mostly locked in externalities of features and complexions. Generations have grown up, fed on prejudices of colour, and culture of discrimination. When there is nothing in any religion to associate black with ugliness and negativity, many of the cultures and languages reek of colour prejudice; look at the many expressions in English such as blackguard, blackleg, black-market, black-money, blackball, black hole, black arts that include black-magic, blacklist, blackmail, black sheep, black mass, Black Maria, black spot, black widow, blackshirt, black eye, blackthorn, blackfly, black humour, all carrying negative connotations in varying degrees, so wide ranging that to communicate anything that is unfair, malevolent, cruel, illegal, harmful, the word ‘black’ is a handy prefix. Why not consider a racial purge of languages and use the prefix ‘white’, ‘brown’, or any other substitute, to convey all these negativities, just so that it may wean future generations away from unhealthy bias and prejudices? Ivone Gebara stated loudly that “The beauty that will save us is, above all, not pretty… Beauty does not exist without justice. Such beauty is false, a façade”. We need generations to grow up imbibing proper values and right perception of beauty, encompassing its many facets, beauty that promotes virtue, fairness and justice, as without it, there would no longer be anything to do to the world. In its comprehensive and sublime form, “beauty will save the world”, as Dostoevsky’s Prince Myskin emphatically stated, with unimpaired vision and heightened awareness, even in the midst of bodily ailment, grappling with a disfigured world trapped in darkness and spiritual epilepsy. Verily, it is beauty, and the preservation of beauty, that will save the world.

Advertisements

47 thoughts on “A Thing of Beauty, And Divinity…

  1. This is true and extremely well written, Raj. There are libraries full of books teaching theories on external beauty. When it comes to spiritual beauty so many are blind even though their eyes can see.

  2. Hi Raj,
    Terrific! Power-packed and thought provoking! This post touches upon almost all aspects of beauty…natural as well as unnatural…what amazes me are the varied perceptions that this one word evokes… from Nature to consciousness, from earthly to ethereal!
    Beauty and sensitivity has a profound connection that is why it has been said ‘beauty lies in the eye of the beholder’ and I truly agree with David Hume who observed, “Beauty is no quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind which contemplates them; and each mind perceives a different beauty.”

    • Thanks Balroop… I would hold the view taking in both factors, the quality adorning the object, and its perception in the mind of the beholder; perceptions may vary from individual to individual, but it is the object’s quality that causes it.

  3. Intriguing, Raj! I find that internal beauty can really enhance outside beauty. As well, ugliness within (such as racism) can deter from outer beauty and lessen that external look. I enjoyed your reflections, including the discussion of Guy Sircello. How did you come to know about Sircello? I had not heard of him before and wondered if there is a related book to read from him. I hope you have a marvelous, beautiful weekend ahead! Thank you for the thoughtful blog post here!

    • Thanks Christy for dropping by. Philosophy is a field of my interest, so it is only natural for me to be know names like Russell, Moore, Hume, Sircello, Nietzsche, Camus, Sartre, Emerson, Kierkegaard, Spinoza etc instead of being limited to Socrates, Plato and Aristotle of western school. I also dig into eastern philosophy (both are touched upon in this post); my only regret is that I am a late entrant into a vast field with limited time at my disposal. Read the book ‘Love and Beauty’ by Guy Sircello, if you can get it…best wishes.

  4. Enriching and comprehensive Raj. Beauty does have many facets each varying only in interpretations by different cultures. Yet regarded by all as overpowering and fascinating. Wars have been fought over beautiful women and the beauty of nature, a rose or the majestic Himalayas or Kashmir valley makes our mind peaceful and joyful. So the words ‘while the ideal beauty is an entity admired for perfection’ our Masters tell us that beauty can never be permanent and with the passage of time will change and deteriorate. As such it is the permanence of our inner beauty which is having a pure and peaceful mind that we need to seek.
    Thank you And kind regards.

  5. Thanks dilip.. Beauty of greater relevance is the inner; perhaps, it is the cumulative influence of inner beauty in millions of people that will save the world…best wishes.

  6. This was a magical piece to read Raj. Beauty as they say is in the eye of the beholder. Even post-modernism art has beauty in its own way. For me nature is the true beauty. There are people who are beautiful, they radiate goodness are genuine in their words and actions. We need more of these people if the world is to survive those who are intent on destroying all that is good and precious.
    best wishes Luc xx

  7. An excellent post, dear Raj, ⭐
    the first part, which summarizes the greek and roman accounts is very interesting… I will also add that for Plato Beauty was related to The Ideas, and particularly to the idea of God, which the was the Best Idea, with a sort of moral load, so as to say.
    I much enjoyed the progression on your posts and how you bring different thoughts and cultural approaches as to what Beauty is…
    As to Aristotle, he said that Beauty was on the eye of the beholder.
    It seems that Nietzsche had a more restrictive way of seeing it as he linked Beauty to the Will of Power… I think that he might be right when he stated that power over opposites is achieved something Like Beauty pops up… His aesthetic ideas reminded me of Heraclitus!.
    I thank you for the great reading! All the best to you!, Aquileana 😀

    • Thanks, Aqui, for your informed comments. The western and eastern thinkers threw light on various facets of beauty, in aesthetic forms , like balance, symmetry, harmony, and in subtle dimensions, like symmetry in relationships, balance in justice and realisation of sublime reaches of spirituality. These may well be happening through struggle and reconciliation of opposites, as Heraclitus and Nietzsche would have it. There is also an element of relativity in beauty, as between the most beautiful ape and the most beautiful man, believed to be the highest form of creation, prompting Shakespeare to effuse, “what a piece of work is a man, how noble in reason,/ how infinite in faculties, in form and moving, / how express and admirable in action, how like an angel in apprehension,/ how like a god!”. If there is anything more to be touched upon, aqui, I may restate the statement as “what a piece of work is a woman…” Lol…):)…best wishes..

  8. Wonderful thoughts you have brought together here Raj and Beauty and Truth, Justice etc.. I found this sentence of yours jump out at me..
    ” Beauty and justice share balance and the weighing of sides, according to Stuart Hampshire. We are drawn to symmetry intuitively, and injustices are perceived as imbalance, when something is amiss, not only through reason but also through sensory faculty.”..
    Interesting how we perceive through our senses and emotions as to what we feel is an injustice.. and to what in fact is beautiful.. We are told Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I agree… We each perceive differently, And have been brought up through our various upbringings to regard beautiful as better..

    I am now referring to my days in support work when I would support adults with learning difficulties.. their disabilities could range from Downs Syndrome, Autism, and all had challenging behaviours, and some had mental ages of a 7 year old.. I would encounter when I took them out in public places, open disgust, as people would move away, or cross the street in order to avoid these individuals..
    Yet to me, each one of them held beauty.. Once you got to know their personalities, You saw the pure love they gave, the trust in you, and their complete faith.
    We have become so conditioned to only accept perfection and reject anything that is imperfect within the eyes of the beholder..

    You have delivered a thought provoking post Raj, which has tied in nicely to my own thinking this week..

    Many thanks, Have a wonderful weekend..
    Blessings.
    Sue 🙂

    • Insightful snippets of your work with handicapped people, sue, and how beauty radiated even from externally unappealing facets of life. Really prompts the thought of how beautiful the planet would have been, if only humanity bonded around the underlying beauty in all things, to the exclusion of all divisive interests…let your innate beauty continue to shine benevolently… Best wishes.. Raj.

      • Aww, thank you most kindly Raj, Yes its a real truthful saying Raj, that beauty is only skin deep!… If people could really get to know some of these wonderful disabled souls they would truly witness Unconditional Love…
        Yes they could have bad days, don’t we all?… Their frustrations were often born from others not understanding them as they tried to communicate their problems.. Once you had gained their trust and knew how they communicated, it was a Win Win situation…
        many thanks for the compliments Raj… and again, I so enjoyed your post.. Have a ‘Beautiful’ Peaceful Weekend..
        Blessings Sue

  9. You are an artist that paints so beautifully with words.
    Your reply to Christy Burmingham was very informative
    It explains explains why I found this post so wonderful.
    You are a lover of wisdom.

      • Rajagopal, you have connected with me your post on beauty grabbed me.
        I can easily remember your name, Raja is monarch in Sanskrit, Gopal is a Krishna as a boy cow herder.
        Can I just call you Raj as pal in Aussie a friend. _/\_

      • Hi jack,

        Good day… U have a fair knowledge of Sanskrit, as u have figured out the meaning of my name correctly…con jointly my name means king of cowherds, which is lord Krishna himself.

        U can call me Raj, your friend in India….

        Rgds Raj…

        Sent from my iPhone

        >

      • Thank you Raj,
        It is great to have you for a friend as I will get so much from reading your blog.
        I know only the tip of the ice burg you have the scuba gear. You know words and how use them so well.

  10. You certainly give us something to think about, Raj, and in the end, this sentence spoke the truth:
    “We need generations to grow up imbibing proper values and right perception of beauty, encompassing its many facets, beauty that promotes virtue, fairness and justice, as without it, there would no longer be anything to do to the world.”
    I fear the world (through celebrities and social media) is becoming more plastic and focuses only on the external beauty and completely misses what is truly meaningful and important. This isn’t saying all humanity perceives beauty in this one shallow manner, but it’s definitely “out there” in abundance.
    Thanks for sharing this plethora of knowledge. I’m returning to college in the fall to finish what I didn’t complete many years ago. So I look forward to learning again, as well. Have a blessed Sunday…

  11. Take a bow, Sir, for this amazing post. Such indepth analysis and presentation! You were spot-on about the predominance of dusky beauties in Indian context. Somewhere, we need to give our epics the deep attention that they deserve.
    Of course, the tendency to equate good looks to good character exist even in authors – some as prolific as Enid Blyton and even Ayn Rand. Even studies done on infants shows that they prefer or lean towards prettier faces.
    Beauty remains an enigma to be defined by whoever feels its magic.

    • You are right; in many parts of the world, dogma virtually restraints people from appreciating the beauty of arts and music, likewise there are cultural constraints standing in the way of perceiving beauty, conspicuously and otherwise. The hard fact is that blinkers, in whatever form, only reduce the view. Thanks for coming in, Georgia…

  12. Raj this is a most well written and thought provoking post. Beauty is such a subjective issue I think and how we perceive our own beauty a complex judgement system.

  13. beauty in its place and perspective, seemingly no longer exists. the world is full of chasing after the fleeting or artificial.

    well written as ways Raj

  14. The older I get, the more I feel that inner beauty holds the most importance in our lives (though society disagrees). As mentioned above, inner beauty can make up for whatever outer beauty is “lacking.” This demonstrates the true power that lies behind dictating whether or not someone, even something, is beautiful. If we drop this notion that our exteriors must be aesthetically pleasing in order for us to be deemed “adequate,” then we’ll progress infinitely as a people.

    Thank you for this, Raj. Once again, you’ve crafted a piece that not only provokes deep and wishful thinking, but taps into each of our souls. Definitely my favorite of yours! 🙂

  15. This was such a philosophical, thought-provoking and in-depth post about beauty, Raj. Love how you say that beauty is mystic. There’s beauty all around us, and in particular, there’s beauty in truth and honesty. Nature is certainly beautiful, and so are we when we learn to love ourselves and encourage those around us to reach their potential. ““beauty will save the world”” That is such a great quote and thought. In the end, beauty and love wins all and makes the world go round.

  16. My beautiful friend,

    Please forgive me for taking such a while to come and sit with your gorgeous words. I have been quite sick and am just now feeling a bit better today. Your warm invitation to your space was on my mind. And here I am. Thank you so much for that. 🙂

    I loved your piece very much. I wanted to give myself time to really read it and take it all in. This phrase ‘unity in variety and variety in unity’ will stay very close to my heart as it holds so very many truths inside – even in so few words.

    Your writing is eloquent and so full of sweet, strong wisdom. Thank you again for welcoming me always, dear Raj. Your work is warm and knowing. I feel blessed to have experienced it.

    May your Sunday be filled with love, light and peace,

    Allison

  17. What a wonderful and informative post Raj. My favourite line is: “Beauty in its most sublime form resides beyond all of these; it exists in the totality and intensity of the mystic, as the greatest flowering of consciousness itself”. Through that sentence alone, I feel you have not only stated the Truth but encompassed it through your magical words that radiate beauty! I agree too, we absolutely need the current and future generations to shift their priorities and perceptions as to what beauty means, and the qualities we want our future generations to focus on. Thank you for another informative and thought-provoking read!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s