Journeying To The Great Beyond…

Lake Pontchartrain Causeway, Louisiana, USA..

To say that life is full of stress and strain may be to state the obvious. What makes us stressful is our concern for the external world, urging us to act based on our material identities. In turn this creates expectations, competition and control, leading to stress. And that is how life plays out for most people, a narrative punctuated by hard toil, struggles, serial failures and occasional triumphs. The sagely advice point to monitoring our consciousness as an efficacious stress-buster, by choosing to operate without the mantle of identity-linked ego, of being a spouse, parent, teacher, technocrat, entrepreneur, administrator and the like; through a soul-centricity that radiates qualities of the soul even if situations go wrong. We are the actors, or souls, performing every scene combining our physicality and mental attributes on the world stage. If every actor’s true nature of peace, purity, joy and love are given full play, every role becomes a pleasure – effortless and free of stress.

The vast majority, still uninitiated in such spiritual subtleties, continue their lives in close identity with their roles and, hence, stresses and hardships are mostly fellow travellers in the hurly-burly of quotidian routine.  

The next half century will bring more change than the previous three centuries. The statement is not as hyperbolic as it sounds because we are already crossing a crucial threshold that was previously unthinkable. Technology is no longer simply changing our environment; that is, what is around or outside us, or the hardware we use. No more is it just a tool. Technology is well on its way to becoming a creative force, and a thinking machine, as well. It is now gearing up to get inside us, thereby changing who we are and rapidly redefining what it means to be human, in ways transcending the limitations of humanity. If intelligent machines are to perform our routine work for us, we will have to train them, teach them, connect them to us – in effect making digital copies of ourselves, cloning our knowledge in the cloud. This will alter us; and it will alter our view of what we are and what we could be, as well as what the machines are. And this is only the first step… The world is becoming hyper-connected, automated and uber-smart – for everyone’s benefit. A significant number of the over seven billion constituting global population stays ‘connected’, with each one seeing a smorgasbord of information and content all the time. We interact with platforms via augmented reality, virtual reality, holographic screens, or via intelligent digital assistants. Our digital egos are moving to the cloud and are developing a life of its own.

Such leaps in technology are bound to create its own paradigm shifts in human values and cultures. What was considered kosher a couple of decades ago may either no longer be so or may need to be revisited in light of today’s compulsions. The spectre of an aging population in my native state looms large, given the reality of globalization drawing young people far away from their home provinces and countries, leaving nearly empty nests of aging couples left to fend for themselves in their twilight years. State welfare measures cover merely microscopic numbers, comprising politicos and those in government service; vast sections of people are outside its ambit. Even if the monetary aspect is supported by resources of respective families, caretakers or hospices are woefully short of demand in sharp contrast to ready availability of such facilities in Europe, Canada, Australia, NZ and elsewhere.

What then is the way forward? One of the finest thoughts of the 20thC that opened the floodgates of possibilities and probabilities is that of French social philosopher and anthropologist Claude Levi-Strauss. ‘The scientific mind does not so much provide the right answers as ask the right questions’. In fact, the entire history of human intelligence is more to do with dwelling upon questions rather than their answers. ‘A question gives direction. An answer closes it’, said Socrates more than three thousand years ago. The right question is like a rough stone. It has so many possibilities, so many forms unrevealed in it. The Buddha’s penetrating query ‘Why there is so much pain and suffering in this world?’, gave a new direction to mankind. The Japanese adage, ‘A man is known by his questions and not by his answers’, is germane to all ages and eras. A question gives a semblance of idea about the person’s perceptions and discernment. An answer has the base of the question but a question has no prior base. Upanishadic and Greek philosophy are questions leading to further quests and contemplations because the moment one gets the answer, one stops to enquire further. The Buddha says in Dhammapad, “Stop expecting answers. Look at your own question. It has the answer concealed in it. Your question itself is an answer, provided you ask an intelligent one”.

In the same vein, let us revert to the question of those steadily burgeoning numbers of aging citizens, increasingly isolated by the dynamics of contemporary living. What next? Do they continue to drift towards twilight years, with steadily deteriorating mobility and other functional impairments? What about terminal illnesses that drag on for years with shattering impact on the quality of days and nights remaining on life’s calendar? Bereft of all hope, is there any meaning in a person who is terminally ill struggling till the very end for natural ebbing away of life? Is there any obligation to somehow muddle through waning faculties and heavily compromised dignity, awaiting Nature’s guillotine? Can societies everywhere not migrate out of religious claptrap to embrace voluntary euthanasia as a much longed for and dignified departure to the unknown? Our sense of rationale must not be blinkered by faith and bound by dogma. Robert Barron puts it with clinical objectivity: “Faith is not infra-rational, meaning ‘below reason.’ That’s credulity, that’s superstition, that’s accepting things on no evidence, that’s childish…. Authentic faith never involves a sacrificium intellectus, as the medievals said, a ‘sacrifice of the intellect.’ In fact, that’s a sign that your faith is inauthentic. If you feel obligated to leave your mind aside to have faith, it’s not real faith. Real faith is not infra-rational, it’s supra-rational, it’s beyond reason, but inclusive of it…There may be darkness on the far side of reason, but never on the near side. There’s never a suspending of one’s critical faculties. Authentic faith awakens the mind.” Sri Aurobindo expatiates it further: “Reason is not the supreme light, but yet is it always a necessary light-bringer and until it has been given its rights and allowed to judge and purify our first infra-rational instincts, impulses, rash fervours, crude beliefs and blind prejudgments, we are not altogether ready for the full unveiling of a greater inner luminary. Science is a right knowledge, in the end only of processes, but still the knowledge of processes too is part of a total wisdom and essential to a wide and clear approach towards the deeper Truth behind. If it has laboured mainly in the physical field, if it has limited itself and bordered or over-shadowed its light with a certain cloud of wilful ignorance, still one had to begin this method somewhere and the physical field is the first, the nearest, the easiest for the kind and manner of inquiry undertaken. It is regrettable if ignorance becomes dogmatic and denies what it has refused to examine, but still no permanent harm need have been done if this willed self-limitation is compelled to disappear when the occasion of its utility is exhausted. Now that we have founded rigorously our knowledge of the physical, we can go forward with a much firmer step to a more open, secure and luminous repossession of mental and psychic knowledge. Even spiritual truths are likely to gain from it, not a loftier or more penetrating view but an ampler light and fuller self-expression.”

Enter “Sarco pod”, the euthanasia device consisting of a 3D-printed detachable capsule mounted on a stand containing a canister of liquid nitrogen which when inspired puts the person to permanent sleep. Unlike the asphyxiation with accompanying panic and struggle triggered by carbon dioxide fumes, medically known as the hypercapnic alarm response, nitrogen is harmless in the additional sense of facilitating painless and quick transition to unconsciousness. The Sarco was invented by euthanasia campaigner Philip Nitschke in 2017, and usage of the device is reportedly legal in Switzerland and Spain. Akin to stepping into a space capsule, the device with its liquid nitrogen, soon as activated, causes rapid loss of oxygen in the receiver’s body resulting in unconsciousness and death.

If the device spurs more interest in voluntary euthanasia, there is no need to be on edge as it may be a sign that one of the harsh realities of our times is getting addressed. Nonetheless, balance is the key. Holding off technological advances just to feel the way we used to feel before is not progressive thought. To reiterate, we all should be able to appreciate the need to be scientifically and technologically advanced. We cannot be primitive again just to discover the thrill of making fire from flint stones! While staying connected with our natural selves, it is essential that we, the creators of technology, do not lose ourselves into it so much that we forget what we were originally. And that responsibility lies solely with us. In a materialistic world, the most precious commodities are not objects, but emotional states. We don’t dream of owning more possessions, but of becoming calmer, less anxious, and more fulfilled. Wherever we are, the divinely supreme is. In order to realise it, we have to return what we have borrowed from the world: darkness, ignorance, bondage, limitation, imperfection and death. We borrowed these things because we felt that they would help us considerably, but now we have come to realize that they are real encumbrances, and hence these things must be jettisoned, and the things we eternally have in the innermost recesses of our being – peace, light, bliss, truth -, we have to increase. The things that we eternally are, we have to claim and offer to the world at large. Doing this will lead us to the knowledge of the who and where of divinity, which is essentially self-realisation, meaning the attainment of divine Oneness, or self-discovery in the highest sense of the term.

The Many Layers of Grief…

The leaves sway and rustle in joyous abandon in the embrace of the wind fully cognizant that in the march of time and seasons, it will be dislodged by the same wind blowing it off the tree. In almost similar vein, grief, alleviated by occasional spells of happiness, pervades life, holding in thrall and captive every one of us; no matter how hard we try to escape its clutches, it latches on to us and mostly squeezes out our sense of well being. Several factors bear on how long we grieve. Traumatic events that occurred in the shuffle of childhood can be triggered to rise up like old ghosts from the past to send us reeling under the intensity of multiple losses combined into one large ball of heart-wrenching pain, reducing a person to a shell of his usual self. What cannot be fixed is eventually accepted. It alters us, changing our being and world view. The grief does not fade away; it lives within us, mostly as a regulatory reminder of our lives and priorities.

Is grief self-centred? A good number of people lament, grieve, mourn, and wail in keening, ululating cries reminiscent of ritual expressions of sorrow in ancient Greece when loved ones made their inevitable exit; Greece is not alone as the situation is more or less the same straddling cultures and geographies. I have observed similar grief cutting across communities in the country-sides of not-too-distant feudal times and semi-urban regions of India; some people are inconsolable, especially during the current pandemic with mounting death tolls and families and friends losing their kin in quick succession. Overcrowded crematoriums and burial grounds strike hard the stark reality that death knows no boundaries. When Henry David Thoreau used “u-lu-lu” to imitate the cry of screech owls and mourning women in that particular passage from Walden, he was probably re-enacting the etymology of ululate, which descends from Latin verb ululare, carrying the same meaning as ululate, with its likely origination in the echoes of the rhythmic wailing sound associated with it.

Why do people grieve? What makes for sadness? Is it because the person we love is not physically with us, departed too soon and with unfulfilled dreams, leaving behind a young family, or because one could not spend the last moments together, medical help reached a trifle too late, many things were left unsaid or unfinished…or all of these?

What grief looks or feels like is known to all, but not the different layers of grief which pour out according to situations and circumstances through which the events of life play out. At times, one may even be unaware of grieving or even experiencing a loss that deserves to be grieved. Grief is a person’s reaction to relationship losses in life in the form of death, loss of physical or cognitive abilities or things as mundane as home or livelihood. In addition to its emotional outpourings, grief expresses itself in physical, behavioural, social and cognitive ways:

For family caregivers, grieving can start long before the person being cared for actually passes way. Anticipatory grief often starts when the person being cared for is diagnosed to be in advanced stage of a disease to be followed by steady deterioration into the inevitable. Feelings are related to the loss of hope and expectations around the life that may soon be extinguishing. It can be difficult to converse with others about anticipatory grief because the person you care for is still alive and you may have feelings of guilt or confusion as to why you are beset with this kind of grief.

There really are no set guidelines to define normal grief in terms of timelines or severity; normal grief is a predictable response to an unfortunate event that arises concurrently with an ability to move towards acceptance of the loss. With this comes a gradual decrease in the intensity of emotions. Those who experience normal grief are able to continue to function in their quotidian activities.

Delayed grief is when reactions and emotions relating to a negative event are postponed to a later time, to be triggered by another major life event or even something that seems unrelated. Responses of the person concerned can be in a greater intensity than that warranted by the current situation without the realization that delayed grief is the underlying reason for the emotional outburst.

Normal grief that assumes severity over the long term causing significant impairment to day-to-day functioning is described as complicated grief. The trigger to it has been attributed to the personality of the affected, his relationship to and factors surrounding the loss or death in terms of its suddenness, violence and multiplicity. Warning signs of a person experiencing traumatic grief include self-destructive behavior, low self-esteem, violent outbursts or radical lifestyle changes.

A loss that is felt keenly by an individual need not always be appreciated by others. Such instances give rise to what is termed as disenfranchised grief; examples are loss of a pet, colleague, or a person’s gradual decline in physical or cognitive abilities. The person is physically present but significantly absent in other ways.

Feelings of hopelessness, sense of disbelief in the reality of a loss or avoidance of situations serving as reminders of loss, or loss of meaning and value in belief systems build up to chronic grief which, at times, is experienced as intrusive thoughts exacerbating into severe clinical depression and substance abuse.

Continual losses occurring over short time spans are experienced as cumulative grief which can be stressful because of its frequency that precludes sufficient space to grieve a particular loss before experiencing the next. Physical symptoms or other negative traits that are out of character are manifestations of masked grief. A person experiencing masked grief is unable to recognize the linkage of these symptoms to a specific loss. Extremes of guilt or anger, noticeable changes in behavior, hostility towards a particular person and other asocial traits are manifestations of distorted grief.

Intensification of normal grief responses may worsen with the elapse of time; described as exaggerated grief, an abnormality dilating into suicidal tendencies, drug abuse, abnormal fears, nightmares and even the emergence of underlying psychiatric disorders. Lack of an outward expression of sorrow is a typical example of inhibited grief, where there is a conscious effort to bottle up sentiments and keep things private. Unbridled stoicism can have its own negative fallout. Another variant of inhibited grief is called absent grief, when a person shows either nil or only few signs of distress over the death of a loved one. It is an impaired response resulting from complete shock, denial or avoidance of emotional turmoil of the loss. A person experiencing absent grief for an extended period of time is a cause for concern.

Mourning and grieving is related to the one still alive; celebration and fond remembrance of the just departed are related to those who are no more. The difference between grief and celebration is the difference between selfishness and unconditional love. We are sad and even angry because we are deprived of the presence of a dear one. But the one who is gone is liberated from all these emotions and conflicts. How often we hear someone say “I miss my mother / father / spouse who was so caring, sacrificing and considerate, worked tirelessly, made my life comfortable…”, and so on. All of this is indicative of self-deprivation felt by the bereaved when their companions or friends leave them ‘in the lurch’. Self-centred grief is like mourning for oneself. At one’s loss. It is not about the departed, as such exits are pegs to hang one’s grief on. Unconditional love would express itself in gratitude, fond remembrance and celebration of a life well lived. Chiming appropriate response to the passing away of a completely successful life or even a complete life is not by chanting dirges but by ringing merry peals.

Living in peace and harmony with people is among the most difficult tasks. It is, perhaps, easier to live with birds and animals. Why is living with people a problem? We know that fire is hot and accept it as a property of fire. If we are burnt by exposure to fire, the fire is not blamed. Again, if we are admiring a beautiful full moon and someone else starts to appreciate it too, we do not say, “why are you looking at my moon? you have no right to view it!” There is no sense of ownership, no possessiveness; there is acceptance without any projection of likes and dislikes. The Gita says that a wise person moves everywhere with love and affection. Like the wind blowing freely, he does not get attached to anything. He accepts all, without being affected by the deportment of people and configuration of circumstances. “Such a man of wisdom lives with his senses under control, free from personal likes and dislikes, and therefore, enjoys every object, place, situation and person”. As Joshua L. Liebman expressed it eloquently, “The melody that the loved one played upon the piano of your life will never be played quite that way again, but we must not close the keyboard and allow the instrument to gather dust. We must seek out other artists of the spirit, new friends who gradually will help us to find the road to life again, who will walk the road with us.”

The message is that one should accept things as they are. If a change is necessary, try to make that change, but do not insist on it. When one is living with people, it may not be possible to have no expectations at all, so one should have expectations that are reasonable. What is required is love and affection in conjunction with freedom and space. Loving someone should not mean confining the person in one’s love. Is it possible to love without attachment? The sagely answer is yes. By all means love, but never be possessive of what or whom you love. Being possessive brings in the feeling of ‘this is mine’ when in actuality nothing or no one is ours. We are all here on a spiritual journey. Along the way we find several co-travellers who become part of our lives but they too have their destination. There is a hierarchy of love. Right on top are parents, spouse, children, siblings, other families and friends. Love stops here and further down the line it becomes ‘like’. The sages exhort us to love all as if our own. Universal love is not easy to follow but worth trying. For peace and happiness, it is necessary to live in love. Love flourishes through giving and forgiving. Hence develop love, immerse in love as love is the basis of everything. It should not be confined to people or things we perceive as ours. As the Hebrew proverb goes, say not in grief ‘she is no more’, but live in thankfulness that she was. Every beginning must have an ending; let us make our peace with it and all will be well.

Incredible India@75…

Time is once again projecting the luminance of another 15th August, the significance being that at this time around it is not just another day commemorative of India’s freedom from colonial hegemony but it also marks the 75th anniversary of that midnight hour in August 1947 when the spirit of a nation, brutally shackled for long, extricated itself towards life and freedom. Prior to the colonial invasions, the huge Indian subcontinent was a cluster of around six hundred kingdoms, mostly prosperous but politically weak, warring as they were among themselves with each trying to expand influence and widen territories. Divided against itself, the entire region became easy prey to external aggression; the imperial powers from outside exploited the situation; a few centuries of colonial rule left the country bereft of its wealth and in dire straits in all respects. 

Photo by Studio Art Smile on

Born eight years later in 1955, I belong to the country’s post independence generation. A few years forward, I was into school from the early 1960s onwards. The day used to be celebrated at the school by hoisting the national flag, parades of senior students duly inspected by the Principal, followed by distribution of sweets. My turn to participate in the parade came several years later. Into senior classes, I was part of the parade line up in 1969. Being short of frame, I was among the front row and readily visible to the Principal who paced up to me in the course of inspecting the parade; and he asked me in a whispering tone, “how many years since India became independent?” Slightly nervous, I blurted out the figure of twenty two. Upon which, much to my relief, he graciously added, “remember we are celebrating the country’s 23rd Independence Day”, and peeled away.
At the national level, there was the customary speech by the then prime minister, enumerating the challenges and opportunities before the nation and governmental plans to lead the country on the path of progress.

Another milestone event in this context was in 1972, which was the silver jubilee year of Indian independence. I was an undergraduate in a college in Madras (now Chennai). The entire nation was ceremonially spruced up and illuminated in splendour befitting the silver August 15, with people all agog in the spirit of jubilation and festivities. For me, away from home in a distant place for the first time, it heralded a special feeling of liberation tempered by a greater sense of responsibility. Poised at that juncture, was the spirit of a young nation together with a teenager, with challenges to tackle and goals to be realised. Years rolled by, and another couple of decades and more slid by to take the nation to its golden jubilee year of 1996. By this time, I was steeped in my career years and stationed out of the country. As an expatriate, I missed the pomp and glory of India’s 50th Independence Day celebrations. Catching up on some of the excitement on TV was the only consolation.

The tone and tenor of the national day celebrations appear, of late, to be undergoing subtle changes. Until not too recent years, a significant number of people who lived through India’s freedom struggle, and the heady days of Mahatma Gandhi and other stalwarts, were still around in public life and other spheres of activity to convey a continuum of the emotions and throes of a nascent country and her fledgling years under a still inchoate democracy. These served as a beacon light illumining the path of others taking over the reins of government. For the past seven years, the country’s leadership predominantly consists of people of post 1947 vintage. As time passes, there will inevitably be no Indians around to present a direct connect to the year 1947, making it a challenge to preserve the relevance of 15th August for future generations. Retaining it as a solemn event of the state with hardly any people’s participation will serve little purpose.

The seventy fifth anniversary of independence, today, may be the ideal time to initiate the process to make it a truly people’s celebration. It may be an occasion to take stock of achievements and failures, and reevaluating the way forward. We have held together as a rambunctious democracy; yet, is the system actually facilitating progress at the desired pace? Or is it that the framework of democracy is in the hands of corrupt practitioners? And is the country suffering from a surfeit of democracy with endless discussions, stonewalling and dissent? True, the country has made fairly impressive strides over the last seven decades in poverty alleviation, attaining food security through higher agricultural production, development of industries and services, education and health care. Still, looming ahead is a vast distance that needs to be travelled, given the size of the country and the huge multitude of its people. Goals are to be broadened to accommodate newer economic and social vision to allow for nurturing young and aspirational India’s innovativeness, flair and talent through quality education and healthcare, building resilience with better preparedness for threats from vagaries of climate, natural disasters and pandemics; reforms in the agro sector to mandate farming practices that are environmentally sustainable and in consonance with requirements of changing dietary habits and lifestyles; comprehensive social security and insurance reaching out to all vulnerable sections of society. The potential of 1.38 Bn Indians points to a booming economy of USD 20 Tn GDP as compared to where it stands at the moment.

While pandemic concerns may be a dampener to celebrations this year, 15th August may well be programmed as a day when official spaces are made open to the public, a day when people are encouraged to wear miniature models of the national flag on their sleeves, promote neighbourhood camaraderie and merriment. The great diversity of India must be subsumed by the greater fervour of patriotism, resonating in the words of the poet “Bharatam ennu ketaal abhimaana pooritham aakanam antharangam”, meaning “the very name Bharat (India’s original name in Sanskrit, meaning the land of Bharata) must fill one’s inner self with pride”. Patriotism is not an exclusionary sentiment that sets up one’s own country and jettisons the rest. Patriotic zeal is an abiding love for the country into which one is born irrespective of its deficiencies and reflected in the act of courage and valour towards one’s country in times of war; it is upholding a sense of attachment to homeland and respecting the rights of other nationalities. It is defensive in nature, both militarily and culturally, in sharp contrast to nationalism and various shades thereof, which is inseparable from the desire for power. India’s ethos is based on Dharma, or the order that sustains. Further amplified as Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, meaning ‘the world is one family’, a Sanskrit phrase occurring at beginning of a verse in the Upanishad exhorting humankind to live in the consciousness of oneness, as an extended family drawing on shared resources, sans discrimination and affording equal opportunities. India’s integrity, despite its diversity and heterogeneity, is also a major inspiration for the countries of the EU, apart from their strategic interests, to stay together.

Across the next twenty five years, when the nation would be heading to its 100 year anniversary, India must metamorphose into an economic powerhouse of the 21st C and, more importantly, a happier and secure place for its citizens.  The future generations of Indians must continue to joyously connect with the occasion and pride themselves on the glory of India as amply testified by Mark Twain,”India is the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend, and the great grandmother of tradition. Our most valuable and most artistic materials in the history of man are treasured up in India only!”, and Romain Rolland, “If there is one place on the face of earth where all the dreams of living men have found a home from the very earliest days when man began the dream of existence, it is India”, and Will Durant, “India was the motherland of our race, and Sanskrit the mother of Europe’s languages: she was the mother of our philosophy; mother, through the Arabs, of much of our mathematics; mother, through the Buddha, of the ideals embodied in Christianity; mother, through the village community, of self-government and democracy. Mother India is in many ways the mother of us all”. Vande Mataram, Jai Hind…

Regretful or Angsty?

Life is a mix with ominous overtones in these uncertain times. Up till couple of years ago, it was a mix of weal and woe mingled with opportunities for progress. Alas, in the muddled state of now, life is an almost clueless groping around, besieged as the world is by the enigmatic nature of the mix, laden with dreadful events setting off regrets and angst in grim patterns, leaving many deeply regretful of missed opportunities, follies and foibles, and angsty of looming uncertainties. A few others are grateful for life’s blessings, without being regretful about failed ventures. Regret may appear to be a natural emotion to some, but to others it is equally facile not to grieve over past or present adversities. Regret can also be a negative emotion, dissipating mental and physical energies.

The only difference between regret and fearful anxiety is that the former is in the context of past and the latter in the context of future. Regret may be a disappointment with a particular action or outcome even when a person’s efforts are based on his or her best construal in each situation. Given that related problems can spiral out of control due to its unpredictable dimension, they do not justify a person’s undue concern over an unfavorable outcome. Fretting or regretting, therefore, is against the immanent and inviolable laws of the universe operationalized by Infinity. Regret differs from remorse, which is a feeling of penance for moral transgressions. It positions the transgressor on a corrective course. In the overall scheme of things, the rough edges of negative events can effectively smoothen if these are deemed for ultimate betterment. Learning from mistakes and moving on, in a spirit of no regrets and forward-looking optimism, must be the way to go.

The general belief depicts gods as creators; but it is we who create our gods. We sense our purest qualities but are unable to accept them as ‘ self.’ We initially view them outside us, and call these our gods. At a deeper level, it is the vision of Self. Our highest ideas of the Self that we are unable to claim within us, we project as gods. Seers, who were able to visualize these highest potentials, expounded them in forms and names. Accordingly in Eastern traditions, auspiciousness, god-speed, life force and formless infinity are portrayed as Shiva, abundance as Lakshmi, and wisdom as Saraswati. And to further enumerate these qualities or essences – as each is made up of innumerable facets, these were anthropomorphized – stories and mythologies were woven around them as personalizing or humanizing an abstract quality led to easier comprehension. The crux is that divine qualities are attainable to those who are able to realize the higher potential within.

Our purest visions of Self become our gods, so we project the source outside as our goal. The gods are not stagnant, but are expanding every moment through us, their extended selves. Perfection is a dynamic state of being and not end of the road as often held out to be. As our current self thus taps into our ever expanding gods or higher potential, there is always more to attain. We contribute to our god selves and vice versa, and so the cycle goes on, also leading to a continually refined perspective on Nature, with the realization that excessive consumption of natural resources is headed towards cataclysmic ends. The way to resolve the conflict between human values and technological needs is not by shunning technology like neo-Luddites, but by breaking down the barriers of dualistic thinking that prevent a real understanding of what technology is – not an exploitation of nature, but the fusion of nature and the human spirit into a new kind of creation that transcends both. The world is first improved in one’s own heart, head and hands, and then worked outwards from there. Nature is a part of the divine, it is its expression. Before the divine can be brought into people’s lives, they must bring nature into their lives, not otherwise. The reverence for Nature ultimately transforms itself into a prayer to the divine, into the realization of consciousness. What is consciousness? Consciousness is the One without a second; the Source of everything, totality of manifestation, and everything therein, is Consciousness Itself. All there is, is Consciousness, not aware of Itself in Its noumenal subjectivity, but perceived by Itself as phenomenal manifestation in Its objective expression. What we really and truly are, is Consciousness Itself, the formless Brahman.

Whether the manifested universe exists or not, Consciousness is there as the subjective Absolute. Hence the appearance of the universe exists in infinite Consciousness, just as the notion of distance or emptiness exists in space. Consciousness cannot but be immanent in everything that appears to exist. Yet, no phenomenal manifestation can have any kind of relationship with Consciousness because a relationship can exist only between two entities. It is in this sense that Consciousness is transcendental to the manifested universe. What appears within Consciousness as its own reflection – the manifestation of the universe – is not separate or different from Consciousness. While the shadow, by itself, has no existence and is, therefore, unreal, the shadow is not different from the substance when seen together. Max Planck nails it precisely when he says that “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness”.

It is well known that the human brain has two sides, the left, consisting of the analytical and logical mind, and the right, representing one’s creative and artistic responses. It also delves deep into inner space and spirit. Modern education has aimed more at material and physical comfort with less emphasis on moral and spiritual well-being. As a result, societal development is lopsided; human mindset has turned materialistic, people have become self-centric rather than soul-centric. Wanton materialistic and sense-centric indulgence has led to spread of gross body consciousness, vices, vulgarity and crimes against vulnerable sections of society. True liberation can be attained through spiritual empowerment, which is key to all kinds of outer empowerments, whether socio-economic or political. It calls for consciousness training and transformation through awakening of one’s innate qualities and inner powers. In fact, spiritual qualities of peace, love, truth, cooperation, transparency and trustworthiness constitute the mother-power of salutary nurturing and transformation, of people and negativities. Happiness is everyone’s principal aim. Even countries have embraced the idea. The US constitution makes the ‘pursuit of happiness’ an inalienable right. In various forms, South Korea, Japan and Brazil also have happiness in their charters. Bhutan has a gross national happiness index. The UN celebrates World Happiness Day on 20th March every year.

But what exactly is happiness? Perhaps the best account of happiness is from Greek traditions. It falls into two broad buckets: one that focuses on pleasure, propagated by Epicurus; the other on virtue, advocated by Epictetus. Happiness can be defined in many ways. Hedonic happiness is achieved through experiences of pleasure and enjoyment, while eudaimonic happiness is achieved through pursuit of virtue, excellence and greater purpose. Both kinds of happiness contribute to overall wellness in different ways. Chasing one to the exclusion of the other, however, will not make for a complete life. It is up to each one to find the delicate balance of pleasure and virtue. Shawn Achor, whose TED talk on happiness is among the most viewed, has a simple premise. People think that happiness is a result of success. But neuroscience research shows that the reverse is actually true. His view is not about denial of problems, but a view about the power of human agency to overcome challenges. His research shows that career success is 25% predicted by IQ, the rest by a person’s optimism levels, social support and the ability to see stress as a challenge instead of as a threat. The bottom-line is that the external world can only predict 10% of people’s long-term happiness. The remaining 90% is determined by how the brain processes the world. Indeed, happiness comes from within.

Robert Biswas-Diener in his research, the AIM Model of Happiness, sifts out three factors: attention, interpretation and memory. What we pay attention to is what dominates our mind. So, to be happy, one should not underestimate the small, good things that happen every day. The world is a laboratory for interpretation, and objective responses will trump emotional ones in providing happiness. Memories are to be used as assets. Investing in experiences and savouring them can pay big dividends. Money’s contribution to happiness reaches the point of marginal returns quickly. Not having money reduces happiness, but having more money does not necessarily increase happiness. Social scientist Arthur C Brooks has three formulae for happiness. One, subjective well-being is a sum of genes, circumstances and habits. He focuses on habits since genetic dispositions are predetermined, and the effect of circumstances are transitory because of psychological homeostasis, an evolutionary trait that enables people to quickly get used to both good and bad circumstances.

For analyzing habits, Brooks provides another valuable equation: habits are a sum of faith, family, friends and work. Here, faith refers not to religion per se, but to a mental and emotional framework through which one can contemplate life’s deeper questions. The importance of friends and family is demonstrated in another classic study initiated at Harvard in 1938, which tracked the lives of 724 men. The first group comprised Harvard sophomores, and the second was a group of boys from one of Boston’s poorest neighbourhoods. The results were profound: more socially connected people were happier, with happiness not driven by numerical strength of connections but depth of relationships. The study showed that people who reported being the happiest in their 80s were those who were most satisfied with their relationships at 50.

Looking at work, Brooks finds the centrality of productive human endeavour in creating a sense of purpose leading to happiness. Brooks’ third equation: satisfaction is what you have divided by what you want. His emphasis is on the denominator, eerily similar to the Vedic philosophy of controlling one’s wants and stepping down from the hedonic treadmill. Being happy often means looking beyond imperfections and stepping on the escalators of gratitude, kindness and a smiling disposition that cultivates intention without attachment, focused more on intrinsic than extrinsic goals. Pertinent here is also Dale Carnegie’s idea of living in ‘day-tight compartments’ to complement long term ambitions. Our main business is not to see what lies dimly at a distance but to do what lies clearly at hand. Saddled with too many tasks, we become frozen in fear and move around in circles, like deer caught in front of vehicle headlights, as we try to think our way out of problems; we get into an anxiety mindset and find ourselves living in the future instead of doing the needed duly focused on the now. Anxiety sets in and suddenly, everything seems so much worse than it actually is. Living with this constant baseline level of anxiety is the reason why we struggle to achieve what we want to. The solution is mindfulness and living for the day as a habit. The concept of day-tight compartment is best explained using ship as an analogy; like large, long-voyaging vessels equipped with water-tight compartments efficiently serving multiple functions in accordance with the mariner’s command, our own voyage must navigate towards successful living by compartmentalizing each day to maximize it to its fullest potential before congruently flowing through to the next, maintaining a course that greatly reduces regret by obviating errors of omission and commission, and angst by trimming down room for negative outcomes.

Still unclear, the niggling thought may be, …but focused only on today, how do I work towards future goals? Dr William Osler, celebrated as the father of modern medicine, was a prolific achiever in his field; he accomplished the feat not by eschewing goals, but by redefining it across available timescales and utilizing each day to inch closer towards targets. By setting goals and utilizing each day-tight compartment to hyper-focus on every single task that speeds one closer to goals, a person transitions from a life of endless distraction and worry to one lived calmly, mindfully and productively.

And the future? Is it possible to know what tomorrow will bring? There are three known possibilities. The first thing is that tomorrow is going to be different from today. It is naive to think otherwise. The second is that tomorrow is not only going to be different from today, it is also bound to be different from what is expected. That is the very nature of life. And most importantly the third, a person makes his own tomorrow by what he does today. Through regular mulling over the course of action, the cosmic energy signals will keep becoming stronger pointing to the right path. Hence, instead of choosing to drift with worldly currents, the aspiration must be to catch higher tides of awareness to avoid getting mired in shallows of mechanical living.

Awareness. If we are constantly aware, life is always interesting, for everything inspires us. Awareness is not alertness. Alertness requires effort and has an element of stress. Awareness is stress-free alertness. When we are in this relaxed state, zeal and interest are spontaneous. From Interest arises memory and dedication. No task is to be executed mechanically. Even the mundane act of stirring a spoon of sugar into a cup of tea is to be practised with complete awareness as it always leads to a deep sense of joy and connect with the Source. “Lord, we are rivers running to Thy sea, / Our waves and ripples all derived from Thee, / A nothing we should have, a nothing be / Except for Thee” (Christina Rossetti). “Just as the flowing rivers disappear in the ocean casting off name and shape, even so the knower, freed from name and shape, attains to the divine person, higher than the high” (Mundaka Upanishad). Here, ‘the higher than the high’ is the unmanifested. The souls attain universality of spirit, a-visesatma-bhavam. Eckhart says, ‘And here one cannot speak about the soul any more, for she has lost her name yonder in the oneness of divine essence. There she is no more called soul; she is called immeasurable being’, attaining, according to Vedas, equality of nature and not identity of being.

Offices, Homes and Leisure Spaces…

The C-19 juggernaut is rolling on relentlessly, mutating even more powerfully as vaccines work to build resistance to hamper and neutralize its course. Globally, countries are struggling to cope, by being forced into multiple lockdowns to protect their citizens, causing massive disruptions to work life as we know it – attending offices nestled in brick-and-mortar constructions became impossible. Yet, the rapidity with which the world responded – America saw work from home (WFH) employees growing from under 7% of its workforce to over 45% in mid-2020 – has been amazing. India’s IT industry in particular, and various state governments have also cited the value of WFH together with a permanent hybrid model where people would work partly from office and home (WFO&H) even after the end of the pandemic. Offering huge comparative advantage, both WFH and WFO&H drive inclusive growth, better participation from all parts of the country and enable greater number of women who would have flexibility to work from home.

Being at home working is not a new thing. Scientific inventions and books that revolutionized the world did not emerge from factories; it sprang from the home toils of great minds and geniuses. Fast forward to present times, digital technology empowered the transition to dynamic working, or staying connected and working on the move, multiplying benefits and growth. Employees appreciate its flexibility – a study found 88% Indian employees prefer work from home – and companies are able to observe rise in productivity. The acceptance of remote work by several companies globally is one of the blessings of an otherwise incredibly hard time. The model, adapted in stress and swiftness, has in fact worked out so well that, according to the finding of World Economic Forum, post-pandemic too employers are ready to give ‘work from anywhere’ (WFA) options to at least 44% of employees.

‘Work from anywhere’ now applies across industries, from tech to banking, finance, and even industrial companies handling manufacturing or supply chain management. Corporations leading the change will be pioneers – they will be magnets for talent because remote work enables a company to attract the best minds, oriented to growth and trended towards the future of work.

Such dynamic working is the next logical step in a globalized world, its flexibility easing international collaborations and expanding global talent pools. The greatest benefit for the employee is the control it provides over time, a temporal flexibility arising out of the elimination of the daily stressful commute and rigid work hours in offices as compared to WFH / WFA-enabled flexible work timings based out of convenient residential or resort spaces located away from the din and clutter of urban sprawls. For women, WFA provides added fillip to managing their careers and home lives. For a company, remote working facilitates global hiring of talent without the need to open subsidiaries in different geographies. For managers, the new system necessitates behavioural changes. Subordinates may have to be measured not by the duration of hours worked, but by the quantum of work and quality of output. Also, with remote work people may be in different time zones and, therefore, a lot of work will have to be done asynchronously, on accessible platforms like Slack channels or shared Google docs. Remote work is also an equalizer, contoured not by our location but by internet quality. Most remarkably, work from anywhere has the power to reshape old understandings of work, employees and companies now connecting in meetings of the mind and fusions of creativity, rather than the previous approach of physical attendance, hierarchical communication and regimented hours spent within office buildings. Additionally, WFA is blurring the line between work and leisure by setting the trend captured by the portmanteau term ‘workation’, the novel concept of working vacation, combining clearly planned business with curated recreational activities.

The flip side of WFH or WFA is the unhealthy overlap of home and office or work and leisure, resulting in a lack of respite from work pressures and consequent negative impact on health and wellness. Possibly there are other potential drawbacks too. It highlights the plight of those who do not have much flexibility, including frontline professionals and many in manufacturing and service industries. It accentuates the double shift women face, managing both official and domestic responsibilities. Such drawbacks could entrench inequalities. Instances like promotion biases against remote work, can, perhaps, be successfully navigated by managers drawing from increasing awareness and sensitivity. Technology will aid this journey, with futuristic innovations like hologram glasses, adding data to all that one sees, enhancing one’s view of the world with digitally created content and thereby improving the quality of work. Even the loneliness associated with working remotely may be addressed by augmented reality, bringing people virtually together. 

 Till previously, there was, apart from the physical, an invisible distance for everyone between office and home which enabled most people to mentally offload work pressure en route. Such an option is unavailable now and, hence, life is transforming into an added rat race from one stress to another. What is probably required to tackle the challenge is to instill greater systematization and discipline infusing consistently high energy levels into one’s day-to-day routine. At a glance, WFH and WFA are seen to facilitate higher productivity, lower establishment costs, near elimination of daily commute, substantially reduced fuel consumption and resultant traffic / pollution levels. Overall, a healthier lifestyle and salutary effects on environment. In spite of all such positives, it is doubtful whether the new high in productivity is sustainable over the long run.  After extended time at homes, the compelling urge is towards social mobility and togetherness instead of further prolonging an enforced squeeze from expansive gregariousness to constricted creatures milling around computer screens; the primitive man evolved from hunter gatherers living in caves, moving on to agricultural farms and thence to factories and offices. The pandemic appears to have reversed history by pushing humans back to caves, as peering into digital screens is akin to drudging inside virtual caverns.

Reflections Amidst Whispering Palms…

Annus horribilis 2020? It appears as such from most events and manifestations thus far. As customary around this time of the year, there is the relief of ending (of horrible times) and the hope of a bright new year. The worst is getting over, or so is the expectation, and the new is  around the corner. Most people are conditioned to participate in the recurring ritual at midnight of every 31st December accompanied by the countdown that wipes the slate clean for the all-new to set in. Alas, it is just another evanescent bubble far removed from truth. There will be a sure flip of date on the calendar but it makes no difference to Nature whether the calendar is Vikram Samvat, Roman, Gregorian or Lunar. Animals and birds are blissfully unaware of any change because there really is none and nothing is any different. The mountains stay as majestic, the rivers flow, the tides keep ebbing and flooding in and out; the stars maintain their celestial journey but here we earthlings are prancing about in a parody of some grotesque dance, singing lustily and tunelessly, though in muffled tones this time around, in keeping with the sombreness of 2020, also linked to the passing away of some highly regarded writers, musicians, environmentalists, political leaders and sportspersons. Problems and tragedies cannot be wished away by a mere shift in time. Solutions are, however, possible through paradigm shifts in mindsets by imbibing lessons of the passing year. Patience, empathy, minimalism, adaptability and sustainable living are the qualities needed to take us forward. Trying to ring in the new year without taking these attributes on board amounts to just another diddly squat, that’s it.

The fundamental human urge is invariably to become better than the present, and keep going further incrementally, if not in giant leaps. Essentially longing to expand limitlessly, in an endeavour to approach the infinite in instalments. The strained expression of human desire is described as ‘ambition’. Ambition is a fanciful idea of what one should become. Whereas ‘vision’ is a larger picture of what should happen to everything around oneself. If everyone moves from ambition to vision, then our collective genius will unlock itself to achieve seemingly impossible objectives. The words of David Bohm assume contextual relevance: “We are internally related to everything, not externally related….consciousness is an internal relationship to the whole, we take in the whole and we act towards the whole, and whatever we take in, determines basically what we are.”

Often blinded by orthodoxies and conditioning, we step on snakes, run into fire and allow needles to poke us. Snakes of attachments, fire of desires, and needles of jealousy and covetousness. They bite, burn and hurt. We call it suffering and we think that this is the way of life. We mistake our pain for our suffering. We have little control over the former but the latter is in our hands. We can take things in our stride or be tossed about in the tide. The choice is ours. Pain is inevitable, suffering is optional. Loss is unavoidable, grief is not. Death is certain. Life’s uncertainty, unpredictability, even irrationality make it worthwhile, a blessing. One can see its dimensions as appalling, boring and devious or as adventurous, beautiful and captivating. Up to us. Hearts filled with loving kindness, time enriched with noble actions, mind with good thoughts will eliminate suffering from life, like sadness from a heart that is content. Needles cannot prick one’s soul nor can fire burn it. And snakes, one may ask, what about the snakes of attachment? Well, an evolved person, at the spiritual heights of a Shiva, wraps them around his neck and yet remains unharmed.

Confined to home for most part of the year, we decided to move out to Kumarakom, a nearby lake resort, to enjoy the last weekend of December 2020. Uplifting it was, to spend time on the banks of the almost-sea like Vembanad lake and gratifying to lean on the bark of one or other of the many palm trees of its sylvan banks to absorb some of the equanimity and tranquillity that trees exude, as sentinels of wisdom, as it were, always unfazed, yet so giving, even as they soar skyward. Resting against the tree’s generous trunk is indeed very comforting. Probably this is what inspired sages to meditate beneath trees and attain enlightenment, facilitated in no small measure, perhaps, by the trees themselves. Both the Buddha and Mahavira are popularly depicted seated under a tree, radiating calm and wisdom, comforting all who came to them for succour. The concept is to just be in the forest, allowing the forest to caress and heal, as one opens up all the senses to receive its grace. Interestingly, scientists have found that spending time with trees boosts one’s immunity, via phytonicides – essential oils released by trees and plants to defend against insects, animals and decomposition – something we sorely need amidst contagions in no hurry to go away

Vembanad Lake...

Whispering Palms…

With an abundance of coconut palm trees dominating its landscape, the resort is appropriately named ‘Whispering Palms’. It is a whisper that is audible in the pervading silence. Silence does not mean the absence of sound. It has a sound, a resonance, or, rather, it has many undetectable sounds creating a symphony perceivable at subtler levels. In the desert, the silence is composed of the whispered sigh of sand caressed by the invisible hand of the wind. In the forest, it is the gossipy chatter of breeze-ruffled leaves, the deep exhalation of giant trees; at the banks of Vembanad, it is the lake’s soothing babble and, in distant counterpoint, the lone call of a water fowl. To such sounds of silence are added the undertones of our own breathing, the rhythm of heart beat and the tidal pulse of blood coursing within us in tune with undulating waters of the lake. There is something called Brownian motion, so named after Robert Brown, a 19th C Scottish scientist, who first noted it  as consisting of molecular interaction acting as a kind of background static, a faint buzz. The aria of birdsong and the scurry and scamper of squirrels added to the stillness of the surrounding, contributing to the sound of silence, a sound drowned in a raging tidal wave of cacophony as soon as one reverted to urban sprawls.

Life, surrounded by nature, can be awesome, instilling the feeling that we are a part of something greater than ourselves. Awe is triggered by wonder. Virginia Sturm, professor of neurology, University of California says, “It is such a simple thing to look around for small wonders while you exercise and there is no downside”. The good news is that awe can be cultivated in our daily lives. Consciously watching out for small wonders around us and invoking a spiritual perspective can inspire feelings of awe, a simple way to overcome worry and improve overall health. Looking at everything with fresh, childlike eyes can make us adept at discovering and amplifying awe.

The world is full of magical things, waiting for our senses to grow sharper. One may undertake awe excursions in nature and pay attention to everything around. Experiencing awe makes us more generous towards others, enhances creativity and moves us to do things for the greater good. It is found to increase feelings of connectedness, engender positivity and decrease attachment to materialism. According to Polish philosopher Henryk Skolimowski, “The first act of awe, when man was struck by the beauty or wonder of Nature, was the first spiritual experience”.

 Epicurus of Samos was a major philosopher during the Hellenistic period, who influenced many later thinkers like Karl Marx, Kant and Nietzsche. He founded The Garden, a place where his teachings were put into practice. Contrary to the then prevailing Greek culture, his radical equality enabled women and slaves to join his school. The misunderstanding of his philosophy which persists till today is that it is rampantly hedonistic and self-indulgently pleasure-seeking, exhorting people to “eat, drink and be merry, / for tomorrow we may die”.  In reality, his philosophy uses pleasure as the highest good, that which is valued for its own sake and not for the sake of anything else. He pointed out that one’s actions need to be directed towards attaining ataraxia, that is, deep calm and tranquillity. Ataraxia implies abstaining from unnecessary desires and remaining content with simple things and pursuing virtuous habits. Epicurus clarified all of the virtues as ultimately forms of prudence, and seeing what is in one’s best interest. The absence of prudence is when indulgence is equated with pleasure – such as excessive indulgence that ultimately offsets the initial pleasure and leads to pain. The key concern should be the weighing of pros and cons, of long and short term satisfaction as in the shreyas and preyas of the Upanishads, driving home the message of minimalism, empathy and sustainability.

A new year never fails to urge us to get on those weighing scales and make a solemn, earnest resolution to shed excess weight. Jog regularly, eat right, exercise, are all on the to-do list at least for a couple of weeks until it all gets forgotten in the hurly burly of life. But what of the weight, the burden, we have been heaping on planet Earth? Do we have any thoughts on shedding those mega pounds before we paint ourselves into a corner? According to scientists researching human impact on Earth, the mass of all human-created things including built-up infrastructure, vehicles and all manner of manufactured goods, now “exceeds the weight of all living things on the planet”. Not only that, using a combination of computational and experimental synthetic biology tools and satellite imagery, systems biologist Ron Milo of the Weizmann Institute of Science and his team in Israel approximate that “the amount of new material added every week equals the total weight of Earth’s nearly eight billion people”. And we thought it is only our homes that are overflowing with stuff. So, not only do we need to declutter our individual homes, we also must set about decluttering our collective abode, planet Earth!

Urban ecologist Timon McPhearson says that these study results ought to convince anyone that humans are indeed dominating the planet and not in pleasant ways. Since we are wielding such a huge influence on the planet, this age is being referred to as the Anthropocene Age. “Buildings and other infrastructure weigh more than the world’s trees and shrubs, and the mass of plastic is double that of all animals”, reports Science magazine.

While material transgressions have palpable outcomes, aberrations caused by extreme positions in thought and action may take time to reveal themselves. Buddha strongly advised the Middle Path that avoids both extreme asceticism and worldly overindulgence. Confucius pointed out that excess and deficiency are in fact one and the same thing, both straying away from the ideal of moderation. The Greeks promoted the Golden Mean, a philosophy that cautioned against both excess and deficiency. Al-Ghazali declared, “What is wanted is a balance between extravagance and miserliness through moderation, with the goal of distance between both extremes. As Krishna points out in the Gita, while overeating is gluttony, the one who refuses to eat is an egoist. The one who chooses moderation, a person of equanimity, finds the right balance. The Vedic culture had the required elasticity to embrace varied and newer dimensions into which our society grew in the march of time. The ideas enshrined in the Upanishads couched as discussions held by sages and their disciples in the forests along the banks of the Ganga, the way of life and the eternal values promoted therein, inspired in people an association with the mountains, trees, the silence and spirit of renunciation.

The Gita offers a practical handbook of instructions on how best to organise our ways of thinking, feeling and acting in everyday life and draw from ourselves a larger gush of productivity to enrich the external life around us and to emblazon the subjective life within us, unfolding a way of life whereby one is enabled to be socially more productive and individually more balanced and tranquil, pursuing life at peace with oneself. It has the right prescription for our sufferings – in the marketplace, in the squalor of slums or the luxury of drawing rooms, in the commune and the barracks. It serves us where we are; whoever we may be, whatever may be our challenges, irrespective of time and place, regardless of caste and creed. The more vigorous the wordly life, the greater the number and intensity of problems. Where there are no problems, there the life has decayed, and the community is dead. Life is a problem only at the realization of not knowing how to meet its challenges, despairing under the phobia of problems. Merely designating 2020 as annus horribilis and wishing it away as one of those horrible years without drawing the right lessons may be akin to a traveller shutting eyes to valuable signboards at her own peril. It must be treated as an year of learning and awareness going, hopefully, into making 2021 as annus mirabilis, a wonderful year.

Sounds of Nature…

Listening is a way of being in the moment and being with others. It is also a way of knowing the world, both the natural and human-built environment. Normally, we humans identify ourselves as thinking beings, looking out on and into the environs, separate from the objects that we see – but we are also feeling the vibrations of the world, and if we pay attention to them, a different province opens, which is a world of connection, rather than one of distance.

Upon listening, we realize that we are inside this world, part and parcel of it, instead of looking out at it. At moments of genuine connection through music, we feel a deep kinship with others. And it is based on this feeling of kinship that we can try to build more responsible institutions and a more just, caring and harmonious society.

The sound of nature is the purest form of art around us, for it enriches human beings at three vital levels. Nature’s music delights us at an aesthetic level – we are thrilled by a bird’s call, mesmerized by a gushing stream or soothed by a breezy, murmuring tree. Nature’s sounds make us aware of our environment. We feel the golden warmth of a summer’s day more vividly as bees hum around us while a winter’s cold, dark night comes wrapped in the sounds of an owl’s flapping feathers. It is not just the stunning views, refreshing scents and the physical exercise beyond the city limits, though, which are beneficial for us. In recent years, it has been found that one specific component of nature has a particularly profound effect on humans: her sound. Just think about how disturbing the noise from construction site around the corner or a colleague’s loud phone calls can be. Now, remember what we heard during our last trip to the countryside: we probably perceived those sounds as very pleasant. Whether it is humming of the bees or murmur of a stream, nature’s sounds have been proven to affect processes in the human brain.

It is not necessary to spend vacations around world’s exotic regions. Nor is it required to go hiking every weekend. Even if it is only a little time, one can spend it in the open air – just a few minutes of nature’s music make a difference! En route to office, for example, one could take a traffic-calmed side street or a favourite stamping ground, to possibly hear a squirrel cracking a nut. Instead of spending lunch break in a stuffy room, step outside, and enjoy the meal in the park. Pay attention, and it will be rewarded: even in the concrete jungle, the wind is dancing its way through trees and birds are singing their songs. A brawling river, chirping crickets, and a crackling fire – many people experience natural noises as soothing. Now a scientific study proves what some of us have always known to be true: Nature sounds have a direct therapeutic effect on living creatures as these are almost always associated with creating a soothing atmosphere, and with restoring a sense of peace and calm: the wash of the sea on the beach, for instance; the rustle of leaves, or the liquid sunshine of birdsong.

Sounds serve as medium for meaningful inter and intra species communication. As an example, there is cross-species communication among humans and domestic animals, whether Sami herders and their reindeer, Mongolian nomads and their sheep, trackers and their dogs or children and their pets. Such communication also exists between predators and prey – a noise from a human is often a danger warning to an animal, or an alarm call by an animal warns all other animals within hearing distance. The ‘sound commons’ prevailing among all living creatures is a natural characteristic that must be preserved by humans through environmental conservation, to enable all creatures (ourselves included) to communicate in our acoustic niches in the soundscape. A ‘commons’ is a resource that is shared but cannot be owned – it is like the air surrounding the land and the oceans. A sound commons is a sonic resource, an acoustic space that enables all living creatures and species to establish acoustic niches where they can communicate with least amount of interference. Anthropogenic noise, however, such as noise from ships and sonar or vehicular traffic, airplanes, construction equipment and so on, generate the most disturbance in this natural sound commons today.

A sound ecology is, literally, the study of beings and their sonic relations to one another and to their environment. These sonic relations are direct, physical connections. One being produces a sound vibration – the resulting sound travels in a longitudinal wave and vibrates other beings. By means of these sounds, these beings communicate with one another and with their environment. Importantly, those direct, physical connections also imply direct linkage among beings within a community. So, a sound economy is built on direct personal connections and exchanges, quite like the functioning of a local economy. This contrasts with the distant relations, the indirect exchanges, the legal relations, the contracts and competition we see in an unsound, global economy. Ecological connections expressed through music and sound are thus based on cooperation and sustainability.

It is very important to delve deeper into this way of experiencing the world. We should explore eco-musicology more and think about the study of sound, music, nature and culture, in a time of environmental crisis.

When we start to listen to the sounds of nature, we sense the huge and wonderful mystery that is life, all around us. In music created by humans, we put together sounds, having patterns, informed with emotions and beauty. We do not always know what the message of an instrumental piece of music is though – what we do know is what such music does to us. Animal music is, perhaps, the same phenomena. Animals put sounds together, they perform pieces of music, these performances are full of emotion, structure and meaning, but it cannot be turned into a simple message. But once animal sounds are understood as music, they become far more comprehensible. Upon listening with care, one understands why certain emotions are felt on hearing birdsong or whales singing. We instinctively recognize there is something much closer to music than language in these sounds. Cicadas emerging after years underground to sing for a few days before they vanish again, bees humming as they gather nectar, common birds with the most melodious calls; we hear these species without often paying much attention. Yet on really listening to them, something amazing happens. It is literally like listening to music from another part of the world, in another language, where one is suddenly moved by what is heard. There is a quality deep within animal music that stirs us as human beings.

Revelling in creation of unusual and beautiful sounds, animals are presumably the mysteries and the answers of evolution. Be it the all-night concert of  nightingale, or the mellifluence of white-rumped Shama or the innate musicality of humpback whales, it is not always survival of the fittest  but the most beautifully sounding in nature. Birds warble improvised melodies to get a ‘high’, and not merely as one of those quotidian tasks. As in humans, random musical compositions are said to release feel-good chemicals in animal brains; probably these endogenous opioids make them busk first thing in the morning, to jazz up the rest of their day. In a world impacted by anthropause, meaning the dramatic reduction in human activity due to C-19, Barcelona’s famed Gran Teatre del Liceu recently celebrated their reopening by performing Puccini’s Crisantemi concerto to a full-house audience of plants from a local nursery. It is reported that the ‘planted’ audience was as conceived by Spanish artist Eugenio Ampudia who, like many around the world, was greatly inspired by and drawn to the healing powers of nature; “I heard many more birds singing. And the plants in my garden and outside growing faster, and, without a doubt, I thought that maybe I could now relate in a much intimate way with people and nature”, Ampudia enthused of his inspiration. Given that it is possible to listen to plants and trees making music thanks to bio-sonification – technology converting bio-rhythms into beats and waves -, the possibility of listening to an organized concert of ‘foliaged friends’ in the not-too-distant future may not be far-fetched.  Research indicates that our ‘green friends’ enjoy listening to classical music and hence must have been silently rooting for the UceLi quartet. Each species has its own aesthetic universe – sometimes these universes meet. David Rothenberg refers to ‘inter-species music’, citing his unique experience of performing music with birds, cicadas and whales. The music, he adds, made by a human and a nightingale together, is somewhere in-between the world of people and birds, a magical space which is fleeting but also very powerful. Through years of such inter-species concerts, Rothenberg feels a close connect being forged with species in nature which, perhaps, is perceived by animals and birds as well. A nightingale sings across the night but, significantly, it leaves a space for someone else to perform, interspersed with its own singing. Birds and animals do not choose to be alone, singing in quiet places with no one around. They appreciate a whole world of sound just as humans do. Music from the natural world instills a keener understanding of the ecosystem with our place in it, other beings that share it, and the seasons that shape us all.

We hear climate change in the sounds of the intensifying wind and rain storms around us, in the breaking and falling of trees, the sounds of more frequent forest fires and the terrifying sounds of floods. We hear climate change in the changing soundscapes of where we travel and live, as some species vanish, taking their sounds with them. Climate change is ensuring that our world never sounds the same again.

But nature’s music also touches a deeper place within us. It gives us – as great art always does – both bewildering questions and comforting answers. When we hear a bird trill, a dolphin click its call, or crickets chirp in unison as dusk falls, we become keenly aware of a mystery around us. That mystery is life, which poses to us its own questions – who are we? Why are we here? What should our existence mean? Through millennia, humans faced these questions and found inspiring answers in nature’s music, which murmurs, amidst breeze, birds and rainfall, that you and I are not alone. Nature’s sounds emphasize we humans are part of its great plan, sharing the Earth with other forms of life, many of which communicate with us as well. This is why birds sing around us human beings – they know we share this Earth and this life, of mysteries and love, sorrows and calmness, with them. We are in this together, they seem to say, and this is one reason why nature’s sounds are perceived to be so reassuring.

Alas, nature’s music is changing now. With hundreds of bird species endangered, nearly half the insect species facing extinction and seasons themselves changing as the earth’s air and oceans heat, environmentalists stress in despair that climate change is altering the way our world sounds. This is a change we must put a stop to, to stave off the loneliness of the Anthropocene. Time to cherish nature’s sounds, for it is only when we humans hear nature’s music that we are in harmony, with life and ourselves.

The New Normal…

We are in the midst of unprecedented times, with a raging pandemic setting off far-reaching disruptions and enforcing adjustment to a new normal. In consonance with changes everywhere, the learning exercise is moving from a straight line (learning first in schools and colleges and then applying that same learning throughout one’s work), to a continuum of lifelong learning (learning and application of that learning in several cycles of continuous personal evolution), necessitating a massive overhaul of the ecosystem around us. K-12 schools have to be enabled to create lifelong learners. Once they create lifelong learners, the learning curve is programmed to go from simply learn to learn, learn to unlearn, and learn to relearn, in a process that will go on for decades. Digital learning and virtual classrooms have become the new normal way of imparting education, likely to enlarge into dual mode combining both real and virtual classroom sessions. People are living longer, occasional threat of a pandemic notwithstanding; their professional lives are up against unexpected complexities. At least four or five career options, traversing through distinctly different jobs, are explored during the tenure of productive years. All of that would compel the need to learn on a continuum and learn on a continual basis, leading to challenging imperative of learning just in case, vis-à-vis learning just in time. Learning just in case is about learning everything one can, which could be potentially used in later situations. Learning just in time is about learning exactly what is required in differing contexts. To switch to that philosophy, one must be a lifelong learner. Absent knowing how to learn to learn, it is not possible to switch to learning in a just-in-time paradigm.

Individuals and nation states are withdrawing more and more into themselves in the present de-globalizing world. “People are divided racially, religiously, politically, economically, and this division is fragmentation. It is bringing about great chaos in the world. There is the spreading violence of man against man… This is what is happening; and the responsibility of the educator is really very great. He is concerned in all these schools to bring about a good human being who has a feeling of global relationship, who is not nationalistic, regional, separate, religiously clinging to the old dead traditions, which really have no value at all. The responsibility of the educator becomes more and more serious, more and more committed, more and more concerned with the education of his students”, opined J Krishnamurti long years ago. If the teacher and student lose their deep connect with nature, to the trees, to the rolling waves of the sea, each will certainly lose his relationship with humanity.

Humanism and a sense of fair play are clearly on the wane in the field of international relations. The 21stC was generally deemed to be an Asian century holding the promise of peace and prosperity but it is apparently descending into a spectre of Wolf Warriors arraying menacingly around territorial borders of countries. Years ago, political scientist Francis Fukuyama famously coined the phrase, “the end of history”, predicting the triumph of western liberal democracy post the decline of communism, but sometime later, swept by winds of change, he relapsed into a slow but sure recant. Fukuyama now envisions a grand decoupling – at first economic and then political – between the China model and liberal western democratic model with serious implications for global stability. India is beginning to discern the full implications of that prediction as China’s power-obsessed leadership finds it increasingly hard to resist the lure of a bygone era where the arbitrariness of a regime or quirkiness of an individual could alter the course of geopolitics or the destiny of a nation. China’s bellicose assertions and brazen encroachment beyond borders of neighbouring lands and waters stem from an autocratic hubris clearly set for a speedy implosion, as no construct built wholly on opacity, political illegitimacy and a thorough disregard for an ethical rule-based world order can withstand the human yearning for freedom and harmony. The liberal democratic order espoused by India accommodates diversity, dissent and non-conformity, freedom of thought and action; non-conformism and liberal ethos fuel the spirit and allow imagination a free rein. The result is spurt in creativity and blossoming of human ingenuity; whereas all such urges are mostly snuffed out by rigours of a totalitarian system mandating conformity and unfailing compliance.

The discovery that the universe had a beginning fourteen billion years ago has dramatically changed how we see our place in the cosmos. We now know that we are all part of a vast unfolding cosmic process that had a beginning, and that is apparently headed somewhere. We know we are going somewhere because the mysterious beginning of this process rung in with a monumental, creative leap from primordial nothingness to the dramatic emergence of energy and matter, and, with that, the beginning of time itself.

Around ten billion years later, the miracle of life emerged from seemingly dead matter. And then around four billion years thereafter, the biggest and most significant leap forward occurred with the emergence of mind. Developing the capacity to think, to conceive, to imagine, the universe became able to bear witness to itself.

We are on a moving train that is in a perpetual process of complexification. The universe comes to life and becomes conscious through us. Our brains have evolved a highly developed capacity for consciousness and deep interiority.

From both a spiritual and scientific perspective, we recognize this universal creative unfolding as a virtually infinite process of becoming, with no end in sight. We recognize this process is one unbroken, unfolding, interdependent, unimaginably complex happening that never ends and which perpetually reaches beyond itself, as a quest for the ultimate reality, the unity of existence beyond endless pluralities of manifestation. Science usually concerns real nature of the physical universe within space time causality. In its parallel quest for ultimate reality, physical sciences are crossing the barriers of physics, entering the domain of metaphysics.

Scientific materialism, dating from Newton, Descartes or Laplace, had been a study of matter with atoms as the building block, essentially separate from mind or subjective observations. From this standpoint, Max Planck thought, “Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature… Every advance in knowledge brings us face to face with the mystery of our own being”.

Consciousness is emerging as the indispensable factor in quantum physics and neurophysiology. Max Planck held that matter is derived from consciousness. Schrodinger said that consciousness is the real substratum of all matter and it is always singular. It has no location and uses brain as the receptor mechanism. The wave equation of Schrodinger represents a world of multidimensional reality and validates that the world is a projection of  mind.

Explorations into mystery of the universe have become a spiritual passion with many. The traditional matter and matter, mind and creation and creator differentiation stands fused in a holistic background of all pervading consciousness contemplated in non-dualistic spirituality. Science could ultimately emerge as the science of consciousness in tune with the essence of spirituality. A journey towards such an exalted state of awareness as a liberating goal, may begin with making friends across various cultural and social borders as a part of the ‘spirituality of friendship’. In our wondrously interconnected world, spiritual growth in the present times is best measured not only within religious and national territories, but also between them. One of the greatest signs of spiritual maturity is when we have discovered the freedom, ease and ability to connect with those who think, believe, eat, clothe and live quite differently from us.

The strangest thing about the emotion called love, which ennobles those giving and receiving it, is that it is often born as a response to its polar opposite, hatred, the virulent and vicious cancer of the spirit. The medieval alchemists were widely believed to transmute base metals, like lead, into gold. The physical transmutation, however, was a metaphor used by alchemists to draw a veil over their real quest, which was to find the ‘elixir of life’, to make a substance called the ‘philosopher’s stone’, and transform our worldly devices and desires into the gold of spiritual enlightenment. Just a few of days back, my home town experienced a similar alchemy at work, transmuting leaden sentiments into altruistic gold, when a poor woman afflicted by hepatitis was in critical condition in a local hospital requiring liver transplant for survival, a pricey procedure way beyond the widowed woman’s affordability in spite of having a willing organ donor in her daughter. The daughter’s heart-wrenching appeal for help met with an overwhelming public response resulting in inflow of funds that in addition to covering the medical cost would provide a surplus for her future needs. The Greco-Christian term described this love as Agape, to distinguish it from romantic, familial or patriotic love. Agape is the love that celebrates the indivisible oneness of all humanity, regardless of religious, racial, gender and regional divides. This creedless, borderless love that springs spontaneously is the closest one can get to an intimation of that which is divine.

The making of friends across borders – of religion, culture, nation, caste, gender, race, class – enables one to enter into a unique, yet hospitable space of unfamiliarity, similar to entering a divine space, for the divine or depth dimension of reality is essentially unfamiliar and cannot easily be manipulated into convenient categories of thought and expression. This space may seem quaint or even disconcerting at first, but reassured by the presence and accompaniment of a friend, one begins to feel gradually and gently at home.

The common humanity shared by all cannot be contained or divided by the several artificially constructed boundaries created over time. The spirituality of cross-border friendship is based on the deeper reality of a common human identity and kinship. National and other forms of social borders are contrived and fluid, and unlikely to stand the test of time. Friendship triggers the erosion of artificial margins, and provides a fertile soil for promoting inclusiveness and goodwill as opposed to the disquieting power of divisiveness. These relationships not only enable our entry into another human world, but also call our own limited horizon of meaning and purpose into question. From such relations, mysterious and magical new worlds promise to emerge: of mutual understanding and productive ways of being and relating. There is a new freedom to relativize or question one’s own ways, and to recognize that other ways of being human are also legit. These relations also prompt a questioning of the violence that lies embedded in each other’s histories and social practices, providing an implicit opening for a mutual supplication of forgiveness for past excesses of each other’s forebears, and thereby consigning iniquities of the past to history’s dustbins. More positively, such close interactions enrich and embellish old customs with newer ways of expression and celebration, reconstructing a new world of social relationships based on reinterpretation of old identities. Immigration and exchange of people and ideas led to growth and enterprise around the globe across millennia. The human race did not attain its current modernity and sophistication by being insular. Insularity, fostering xenophobia and nativism, also degenerating into colourism, racism and casteism, translates into dumbing down of societies. By forging equations across the spectrum of communities and cultures, we realize the potential of becoming more human and integrated ourselves, offering ourselves as radiators of bonhomie and happiness.

Troubled Times…

Everything that exists in Nature has its place and relevance therein. Ralph Waldo Emerson’s poem ‘Fable’ refers to a quarrel between a mountain, high and mighty, and a little squirrel, nestling in one of the trees on the mountain. It ends with the squirrel saying, “If I am not as large as you, / You are not so small as I, / And not half as spry, / Talents differ, all is well and wisely put; / If I cannot carry forests on my back, / Neither can you crack a nut”. Everything and everyone has a role to play in the total scheme of things – the mountain and the squirrel, the clouds high up and the dust down below, the tall trees and the tiny weeds growing beneath them. Similarly, every man and woman possesses different capacities that are necessary and useful in their respective spheres and positions in life. Nothing in Nature is redundant or superfluous. Nature’s resources are meant for prudent use, and not for exploitation and mindless consumption. Each one of us has individual genius and capacity for work and by making use of them, we have to try to contribute our best to the commonweal.

Emerson’s poem suggests the futility of any sense of pride over our positions in life, the talents we possess or the nature of work we do. To a keen mind, diversity of the physical world, human talents and capabilities appear to converge towards Oneness. A quick analogy is that of a colour-wheel, which is a flat disc whereon stripes of the seven colours are painted. When the wheel is spun at high speed, only a pure whiteness with no hint of any of the rainbow colours is visible. As the wheel gains speed, it is amazing to see the colours vanishing into whiteness, bringing in the realization that white is the only hue, which through a process of dispersion scatters into different colours of the rainbow. Each colour has its own wavelength. As light passes through different materials, those substances reflect light at various wavelengths, giving the appearance of myriad hues, whereas there is actually only one colour, that of pure light. Similarly, if we look at humanity, we see on the outer surface a variety of people with different hair, eye and skin colours. While appearances may vary, the underlying colour of all human beings is the same. That colour is light. Our soul is our true essence. The variances among us are only due to the different vestures in which the light of the soul is embodied. The varying external features are only seen at the physical level. When we develop a spiritual consciousness, we experience the same inner light within each person, perceiving unity of the soul.

 The need, therefore, is to break free of sectarianism and separatism, move out of belief systems that create division, destruction, conflict and chaos. We have to make a paradigm shift in our collective consciousness. Way back in 1937, in a message at the Parliament of Religions, Rabindranath Tagore wrote, “Curiously enough, it is our religion that zealously maintains the inner barriers that separate and often antagonize nations and people, their respective votaries not even hesitating blasphemously to take God’s own name to humiliate or morally injure their fellow beings who happen to belong to a different community”. The compulsion is to move beyond limited mindsets and open up to merge with integrated wholeness, towards an awakened and ascending conscious level. For consciousness is all-pervading and all-embracing. And, irrespective of nomenclature, God is Supreme Consciousness. An elevated or awakened consciousness enables the connect with non-dual, non-divisible cosmic consciousness where synchronicity of universal oneness and inclusivity prevail. The Ishopanishad states, “He who sees all creatures in himself and himself in all creatures no longer remains concealed”. Through analysis, experiments and explorations, quantum physicists, too, appear to arrive at the same conclusion. According to panpsychism, every animate and inanimate object has consciousness. Consciousness is an all-encompassing energy present in all spheres; so it can change perceptions. Inner evolution is required to achieve higher state of consciousness, where Atman, soul, attains union with Brahman, cosmic consciousness. The infinite dynamism of awakened consciousness can become a unifying force in the face of any kind of diversity.

When the barriers of you and I are surmounted and pure consciousness takes over, our interpretation of life and living changes. Judgmental mind, limiting beliefs, contradictions and complexities make way for acceptance, compassion and understanding for a more cohesive world. Pure existence is where one is in all and all is one. Sage Ashtavakra explained, “You are not the body; rather you are pure Consciousness, the knower of all that you witness. The result of this knowledge will be peace”.

The concept of oneness is further amplified in the Sanskrit word, ekamevadwitiya, emphasizing the defining attribute of the supreme. It means One and only One, with no second. Extended further, it also connotes an important characteristic of every individual human being. Each individual is unique and no two individuals are alike. But here ends the similarity. Whereas the supreme is One, infinite, omniscient, all-pervasive and omnipotent, human beings are physically many, finite and dependent on others for sustenance, nay, even existence. While each human being is irreplaceably exclusive, none can claim or ever achieve complete independence from the collective called human society and the wider environment. Describing the unbreakable bond between the individual and society, Tagore said that “Emancipation from bondage of the soil / Is no freedom for the tree”. If I am the tree, society is the soil that supports and nourishes me. There is no life for the individual outside society and there is no societal progress without assured security and well-being of every individual. It is a mutual interdependence that manifests starkly in a Black Swan event that calamitously threatens both individual and society. Faced with mortality, there is protection only in mutual dependence encapsulated in the phrase, ‘each for all, all for each’. The spectre of destruction of lives that is presently playing out in the form of Covid-19 pandemic has created an unprecedented situation worldwide with consequences that are severe and inherently painful, driving home the powerlessness of mighty countries and continents against a lowly microorganism, and the humbling realization that, at the end of the day, humans are merely biological organisms in the vast chain of existence, deriving sustenance from wellness and equilibrium across the cosmic web.

The world must now come together as One. When asked why as a healthy individual he volunteered to participate in the corona virus vaccine trial in Washington state, Neal Browning enthused in a spirit of reaching out, “It’s to make this end as quickly as possible for the rest of the world”. Not only does the virus not stop at national borders, its antidote can only be found by international teamwork. Not just research on vaccine but even treatment protocols are largely outcomes of global co-operation networks. The well-being of all depends on how every individual behaves; each person can become a potential carrier of the virus, and also a preventer of its spread and thereby a protector of others. Catastrophic events do not recognize boundaries, which are both artificial and fairly recent in the planet’s history and time-span. Dodging the next apocalyptic meteor or the next civilization-blitzing pathogen by a particular country is not a selfish move but constitutes a protective act for all extant creatures and structures, because destructive global events are not selective, striking one nation and sparing another. Walls and quarantines are temporary. The future lies in greater, not lesser globalization to successfully counter a rougue pathogen or a stray meteor, or an equally destructive religious dogma spewing poison and radicalizing human minds. Situations, where the human being is positioned in tandem with life-threatening disease and its antidote, appear rarely in history. It may well be a laser-pointer to the current crisis as an opportunity, indeed an imperative, to promote three game-changing ideals. First, global solidarity based on awareness that we are now living in an increasingly interconnected and interdependent world; second, realigning societies in ways that recognize and guarantee the essential equality and dignity of people everywhere; may the closing of national borders be a temporary measure to fight the pandemic, without allowing it to lead to erection of walls, greater insularity, xenophobia, stigmatization of victims or ideological closing of minds. And third, may the world shift irrevocably towards living wholly in harmony with Nature, eliminating violence and extending compassion not only to other humans but to all forms of life. That we are all in this planet together is not a romantic notion; it is reality.

Towards New Awakening…

“Velicham Dukkham aanu unni / tamasallo sukha pradam”, meaning ‘light is woe my little one, darkness is comfortable’, figuratively denoting the pain linked to worldly knowledge and relative bliss in its ignorance. Simple, yet deeply philosophical, these lines from ‘Irupathaam Noottaandinte Ithihaasam’ (Epic of the 20th Century), a Malayalam poem written by Akkitham Achuthan Namboothiri in 1952,  are still relevant in the present day and age. The general rung of people are susceptible to play of egoistic pursuits and resultant pleasure and pain. The poet holds that, being illusory, it may be highly rewarding to maintain appropriate detachment from worldly knowledge continually defiled by complex ego-driven life of the sophisticated urbanite and gauche rustic haunted by identity born desires.  

As compared to inner world of the self, the external world of forms, identities, dualities and divisiveness is bristling with sorrow and angst, increasingly becoming conflicted, fragmented, tense and polarized. “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam”, the world is one family, proclaimed the Maha Upanishad. Regrettably, it remains a scriptural tenet largely used as a pious declaration sans intent, as communities, scattered around the face of planet earth, regressed into tribal, regional, religious and ethnic formations vying with one another for supremacy and thereby extending spheres of influence. As per recent turn of events, following the example of Assam, other Indian states are expected to consider a register of citizenship that will determine who is a native and who is an outsider. Across the globe, countries are facing waves of mass migration caused by prolonged civil strife, abject poverty and several other severe hardships. Scientists have inferred that these migratory movements are a case of proto-history repeating itself.

That the entire human race has sprung from a common root, located in what is today’s Africa, has long been established by geneticists who have followed the spoor of the DNA of the so-called ‘Mitochondrial Eve’, the mother of all humankind. A group of scientists have presently identified her precise location: the region that spans Botswana, Namibia and Zimbabwe. Now an arid zone, the area abounded in lush wetlands which 200,000 years ago gave rise to the earliest ancestors of homo sapiens. Between 120,000 and 110,000 years ago, two major migrations took place, one to the north-east, and the other to the south-west, leaving behind a residual population of indigenes. These findings give an entirely new mension as to what ought to be defined as ‘home’ and what as ‘outside’ for totality of the human species, and, prior to the designation of frontiers, nation states and setting up of travel-documentary control, provide the ‘inside’ story of humanity.

Is there no end to mankind’s obsessive propensity to create divisions and power structures based on partisan considerations in total disregard to overwhelming evidence of common ancestry? Are religions, specially the Semitic ones, only promoting vested interests, keen on institutionalizing themselves and expanding their base through rampant proselytization, euphemistically termed ‘harvesting of souls’ and thus causing discord in societies?  The systematic and cleverly camouflaged religious conversions of today are reminiscent of the notorious Inquisitions of yore that swept Italy, France, Spain, Peru, Mexico, Portugal and Goa forcing Jewish anusim, Saracens, coastal inhabitants across India and other parts of Asia to Catholicism, revealing the real story of these exercises having hardly anything to do with genuine Christ-consciousness but stemming from the fear of being overpowered by the then growing Jewish population. The Jews were a threat to catholic monarchs who saw the Inquisition as a way to eliminate the source of one of their biggest problems. Furthermore, in the fifteenth century the territory of present-day Spain was at war with Italy and the catholic monarchs had recently re-conquered Granada, making poor economic conditions widespread among majority of the population. Since the Jewish community enjoyed a higher socio-economic status, the catholic monarchs feared a popular uprising; the expulsion or elimination of Jews helped to not only overcome the problem but also to gain access to their wealth. Religious missionaries and bigots perpetrated the same deception, loot and power-mongering extending to other regions in the past, continuing into the present.

The various religions can peacefully co-exist as long as there is respect and amity between them. The starting point of discord and unrest is the assertion of one god being the only true one to the exclusion of all other, deriding others as kafirs and heathens and spreading hatred; each religion consolidating itself into groups and, instead of remaining within confines of homes and places of worship, stretching uncouthly across social and political spheres to operate as power centers, scheming for growth by enlisting numbers through devious conversions and radicalization.

Religions have five distinctly different, though not watertight, domains: rituals, mythology, ethics, philosophy and spirituality. In terms of anatomical metaphor, the external body of any religion lies in rituals and dogma and its operating limbs are in mythology; while its backbone consists of ethical principles, its brain is in philosophy and its heart in spirituality. Rituals, dogma and mythology are dependent on faith of the followers; ethics and philosophy are based on reasoning and rationality, while spirituality flowers in esoteric and experiential wisdom. Hence religions are simultaneously based on faith, intellect and wisdom.

Mutually complementary rituals and mythology are confused by most people as the essence of religion and they rarely desire to venture beyond these two elementary means to an end, often sliding to fanaticism. Since these are based on faith of the followers, religious bigotry and fanaticism also emerge from same faith blinded by dogma and self-serving motives. It is here that Swami Vivekananda advocated that fanaticism be countered by open-mindedness progressing towards ultimate realization.

The backbone of religion lies in its ethical principles designed for self-development and peaceful co-existence in society, enabling followers to be better humans leading lives of honesty, humility, non-violence and benevolence. The philosophical brain of religion concerns existential enigma of creation and the creator, encompassing one’s eternal quest of origin, identity, destination and purpose, setting off queries such as who am I, where have I come from, where am I headed and what is the purpose of life?

The heart of religion is the home of spirituality which is experiential in nature, based as it is on esoteric experience. Spirituality is the culmination, not as much a process of knowing as becoming, attaining oneness with the singular cosmic identity, through infinite expansion of consciousness, merging individual self into cosmic, experiencing divine love, ecstasy and inner harmony amidst diversity of creation. These observations resonate in the Biblical, “I and my Father are One”,  and Upanishadic “Aham Brahmasmi”, “Tat tvam asi”, “Prajnanam Brahma”, “Ayam Atma Brahma” expressing the ultimate oneness of the individual and supreme consciousness.

Given the strangle-hold of religions and religious divides plaguing most societies, it would appear that the eventual solution requires a new breed of evangelists to wean people away from the misleading light of ‘worldly knowledge’ doled out by religious dogmas, outdated customs and obscurantist forces. Such a drive cannot be expected from the powers that be aiming to preserve vested interests by somehow maintaining status quo. The young everywhere must take the initiative, in a spirit of ‘evangelism marketing’, explaining to the world how newer thought process can improve lives by ushering in the scientific approach to tackling life’s challenges on the personal and professional fronts. What does it mean to be scientific? The question is best answered by quoting Hasan Ibn al-Haytham, the 10th C Arab astronomer and physicist: “The duty of the man who investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth is his goal, is to make himself an enemy of all that he reads, and… attack it from every side. He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency”.  

 The scientific method calls for inquisition, not the draconian measure of bygone era, but a neo-inquisition focused on delving deeply or searchingly into the nature of things.  Critical examen that subjects everything to thorough analysis. Human emotions often compromise with objectivity in arriving at prudent decisions when it comes to matters of importance. The scientific bent of mind facilitates better decisions and provides a rational outlook towards life’s conundrums.  A scientific person questions the status quo, leading to innovation both in technology as well as social sphere, serving as engine for social and economic growth. It runs contrary to the top-down edicts of conventional religions, charged with emotion and couched in rhetoric, and mindlessly applied “to everything in life, even to those things which are capable of intellectual inquiry and observation”. While religion tends to close the mind and produce intolerance, credulity, superstition, emotionalism, irrationalism and a “temper of a dependent, unfree person”, a scientific temper enables a free human being, steeped in objectivity and fostering creativity and progress. The spread of scientific approach would be accompanied by a shrinking of the domain of religion, and “the exciting adventure of fresh and never ceasing discoveries, of new panoramas opening out and new ways of living, adding to life’s fullness and ever making it richer and more complete”. Inculcating a scientific temper among citizens is a part of democratization of society. As Buddha expounded, “Nothing is infallible. Nothing is binding forever. Everything is subject to inquiry and examination”.

While political parties and religious groups are vociferous about rights of citizens under the Indian Constitution, there is a deafening silence all around when it comes to constitutional duties and responsibilities of citizens. Says Article 51A(h), “It shall be the duty of every citizen … to develop the scientific temper, humanism and the spirit of inquiry and reform.” The term “scientific temper” is uniquely Indian, formulated by Jawaharlal Nehru. In his book The Discovery of India, Nehru says that scientific temper is “… the refusal to accept anything without testing and trial, the capacity to change previous conclusions in the face of new evidence, the reliance on observed fact and not on pre-conceived theory”. Science and scientific temper are not synonymous. Scientific temper is a way of thinking critically and rationally, the ability to question what is told to us, not being satisfied with an answer just because it is uttered by or with authority. Scientific temper is something that all of us possess and is as much a social and political tool as it is a scientific one. It is, as Nehru said, “… the spirit of the free man”, a thought that finds lyrical expression in Rabindranath Tagore’s oft-quoted poem: “Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high, /  where knowledge is free. / Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls. / Where words come out from the depth of truth, / where tireless striving stretches its arms toward perfection. / Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit. / Where the mind is led forward by thee into ever widening thought and action. / In to that heaven of freedom, my father, LET MY COUNTRY AWAKE!”